Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA.
School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Jan;63(1):21-30. doi: 10.1111/jir.12550. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
Accelerometers and pedometers have been used to monitor the number of steps. However, the evidence on the step-counting accuracy of these devices - especially accelerometers - is limited in persons with Down syndrome (DS). This study therefore examined the accuracy of accelerometers placed on the hip or wrist and of a pedometer with a uni-axial accelerometer mechanism in measuring steps in persons with DS and whether device error is associated with walking speed, height, weight, body mass index, waist circumference, leg length, age or sex.
Seventeen persons with DS (eight women and nine men; age 33 ± 15 years) walked over-ground for 6 min at their preferred speed. The steps were measured with a hip-worn and a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer using the manufacturer's default (DF) and low-frequency extension (LFE) filters, and with the NL-1000 New Lifestyles pedometer on the hip. Steps were also measured with hand tally which served as the criterion.
Absolute percent error was considerable and differed statistically between devices (P = 0.001); however, error improved for accelerometers when LFE was applied (Hip-DF: 31.6 ± 18.8%; Hip-LFE: 9.7 ± 12.8%; Wrist-DF: 32.7 ± 14.2%; Wrist-LFE: 13.6 ± 10.2%; Pedometer: 23.2 ± 22.8%). Bland-Altman plots indicated underestimation of steps for accelerometers and the pedometer. Application of LFE, however, improved the prediction of the accelerometers. The number of steps measured by the hip accelerometer with LFE and by the pedometer did not differ statistically from actual steps. Steps by the remaining methods were significantly lower than hand tally (P ≤ 0.001). Correlations between percent error for each device and walking speed, anthropometry, age or sex ranged between -0.28 and +0.48, and were non-significant, except for age.
The results demonstrated that the pedometer and ActiGraph accelerometers have considerable error in measuring steps of persons with DS. Application of LFE, however, significantly improved the step-counting performance of the Actigraph accelerometers.
计步器和计步器已被用于监测步数。然而,关于这些设备(尤其是加速度计)计步准确性的证据在唐氏综合征(DS)患者中有限。因此,本研究旨在检查加速度计放置在臀部或手腕上以及具有单轴加速度计机制的计步器在测量 DS 患者步数方面的准确性,以及设备误差是否与行走速度、身高、体重、体重指数、腰围、腿长、年龄或性别有关。
17 名 DS 患者(8 名女性和 9 名男性;年龄 33±15 岁)以他们喜欢的速度在地面上行走 6 分钟。使用臀部佩戴的 ActiGraph 加速度计和手腕佩戴的加速度计,使用制造商的默认(DF)和低频扩展(LFE)滤波器以及臀部佩戴的 NL-1000 New Lifestyles 计步器测量步数。还使用手动计数作为标准来测量步数。
绝对百分比误差相当大,并且在设备之间存在统计学差异(P=0.001);然而,当应用 LFE 时,加速度计的误差有所改善(臀部-DF:31.6±18.8%;臀部-LFE:9.7±12.8%;手腕-DF:32.7±14.2%;手腕-LFE:13.6±10.2%;计步器:23.2±22.8%)。Bland-Altman 图表明加速度计和计步器对步数的估计偏低。然而,应用 LFE 改善了加速度计的预测。LFE 应用后,髋部加速度计和计步器测量的步数与实际步数无统计学差异。其余方法测量的步数明显低于手动计数(P≤0.001)。每个设备的百分比误差与行走速度、人体测量学、年龄或性别之间的相关性在-0.28 到+0.48 之间,除年龄外,均无统计学意义。
结果表明,计步器和 ActiGraph 加速度计在测量 DS 患者的步数方面存在较大误差。然而,应用 LFE 显著提高了 ActiGraph 加速度计的计步性能。