• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于 ActiGraph GT9X Link 活动监测器测量步数和能量消耗的准确性和有效性的最新知识:系统评价。

Current Knowledge about ActiGraph GT9X Link Activity Monitor Accuracy and Validity in Measuring Steps and Energy Expenditure: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

AGEIS, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France.

Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 26;24(3):825. doi: 10.3390/s24030825.

DOI:10.3390/s24030825
PMID:38339541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10857518/
Abstract

Over recent decades, wearable inertial sensors have become popular means to quantify physical activity and mobility. However, research assessing measurement accuracy and precision is required, especially before using device-based measures as outcomes in trials. The GT9X Link is a recent activity monitor available from ActiGraph, recognized as a "gold standard" and previously used as a criterion measure to assess the validity of various consumer-based activity monitors. However, the validity of the ActiGraph GT9X Link is not fully elucidated. A systematic review was undertaken to synthesize the current evidence for the criterion validity of the ActiGraph GT9X Link in measuring steps and energy expenditure. This review followed the PRISMA guidelines and eight studies were included with a combined sample size of 558 participants. We found that (1) the ActiGraph GT9X Link generally underestimates steps; (2) the validity and accuracy of the device in measuring steps seem to be influenced by gait speed, device placement, filtering process, and monitoring conditions; and (3) there is a lack of evidence regarding the accuracy of step counting in free-living conditions and regarding energy expenditure estimation. Given the limited number of included studies and their heterogeneity, the present review emphasizes the need for further validation studies of the ActiGraph GT9X Link in various populations and in both controlled and free-living settings.

摘要

近几十年来,可穿戴惯性传感器已成为量化身体活动和移动性的流行手段。然而,需要评估测量的准确性和精密度,尤其是在将基于设备的测量结果用作试验的结果之前。GT9X Link 是 ActiGraph 推出的一款新型活动监测器,被认为是一种“金标准”,之前曾被用作评估各种消费者活动监测器有效性的标准测量工具。然而,ActiGraph GT9X Link 的有效性尚未完全阐明。我们进行了系统综述,以综合当前关于 ActiGraph GT9X Link 在测量步数和能量消耗方面的标准有效性的证据。本综述遵循 PRISMA 指南,纳入了八项研究,共有 558 名参与者。我们发现:(1)ActiGraph GT9X Link 通常低估步数;(2)设备测量步数的有效性和准确性似乎受到步速、设备放置、滤波过程和监测条件的影响;(3)关于自由生活条件下的计步准确性和能量消耗估算准确性的证据不足。考虑到纳入研究的数量有限且存在异质性,本综述强调需要进一步在不同人群以及在受控和自由生活环境中对 ActiGraph GT9X Link 进行验证研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/10857518/054bf169610c/sensors-24-00825-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/10857518/d423d9f940dc/sensors-24-00825-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/10857518/3e8d13250f53/sensors-24-00825-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/10857518/e1680958d5e6/sensors-24-00825-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/10857518/9dbc194f7399/sensors-24-00825-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/10857518/054bf169610c/sensors-24-00825-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/10857518/d423d9f940dc/sensors-24-00825-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/10857518/3e8d13250f53/sensors-24-00825-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/10857518/e1680958d5e6/sensors-24-00825-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/10857518/9dbc194f7399/sensors-24-00825-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/10857518/054bf169610c/sensors-24-00825-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Current Knowledge about ActiGraph GT9X Link Activity Monitor Accuracy and Validity in Measuring Steps and Energy Expenditure: A Systematic Review.关于 ActiGraph GT9X Link 活动监测器测量步数和能量消耗的准确性和有效性的最新知识:系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 26;24(3):825. doi: 10.3390/s24030825.
2
Comparing the Accuracy of Different Wearable Activity Monitors in Patients With Lung Cancer and Providing Initial Recommendations: Protocol for a Pilot Validation Study.比较不同可穿戴活动监测器在肺癌患者中的准确性并提供初步建议:一项试点验证研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 19;14:e70472. doi: 10.2196/70472.
3
Reporting adherence, validity and physical activity measures of wearable activity trackers in medical research: A systematic review.在医学研究中报告可穿戴活动追踪器的依从性、有效性和身体活动测量:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104696. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104696. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
4
Accuracy and Precision of Consumer-Grade Wearable Activity Monitors for Assessing Time Spent in Sedentary Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review.消费者级可穿戴活动监测器评估儿童和青少年久坐行为时间的准确性和精密度:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 9;10(8):e37547. doi: 10.2196/37547.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
7
Validity of Actigraph for Measuring Energy Expenditure in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.《Actigraph 在测量健康成年人能量消耗中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析》。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Oct 18;23(20):8545. doi: 10.3390/s23208545.
8
Carbon dioxide detection for diagnosis of inadvertent respiratory tract placement of enterogastric tubes in children.用于诊断儿童肠胃管意外置入呼吸道的二氧化碳检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 19;2(2):CD011196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011196.pub2.
9
Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.消费者可穿戴活动追踪器有效性和可靠性的系统评价
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Dec 18;12:159. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0314-1.
10
Evaluating the Validity and Utility of Wearable Technology for Continuously Monitoring Patients in a Hospital Setting: Systematic Review.评估可穿戴技术在医院环境中连续监测患者的有效性和实用性:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 18;9(8):e17411. doi: 10.2196/17411.

引用本文的文献

1
Screen Time and Objectively Measured Sleep of U.S. College Students: A Brief Report.美国大学生的屏幕使用时间与客观测量的睡眠:简要报告
Int J Exerc Sci. 2025 Sep 1;18(4):747-756. doi: 10.70252/XDUT8341. eCollection 2025.
2
Challenges and standardisation strategies for sensor-based data collection for digital phenotyping.数字表型中基于传感器的数据收集面临的挑战与标准化策略
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Aug 19;5(1):360. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01013-3.
3
What are the important components of physical activity for people with fibrotic interstitial lung disease?

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Daily Step Patterns With Mortality in US Adults.美国成年人日常步数模式与死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e235174. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5174.
2
Opal Actigraphy (Activity and Sleep) Measures Compared to ActiGraph: A Validation Study.蛋白石活动记录仪(活动和睡眠)测量与 ActiGraph 的比较:一项验证研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 18;23(4):2296. doi: 10.3390/s23042296.
3
Age-related changes in gait biomechanics and their impact on the metabolic cost of walking: Report from a National Institute on Aging workshop.
对于患有纤维化间质性肺病的人来说,体育活动的重要组成部分有哪些?
Chron Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;22:14799731251358584. doi: 10.1177/14799731251358584. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
4
Associations Between Daily Step Counts and Sleep Parameters in Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review.帕金森病每日步数与睡眠参数之间的关联:一项范围综述
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 17;25(14):4447. doi: 10.3390/s25144447.
5
Within-person associations of daily activity to sleep actigraphy following trauma: Explicating a novel index of risk for major depressive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder.创伤后日常活动与睡眠活动记录仪的个体内关联:阐释重度抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍风险的新指标。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1037/abn0001029.
6
Optimizing an automated sleep detection algorithm using wrist-worn accelerometer data for individuals with chronic pain.使用腕部佩戴式加速度计数据为慢性疼痛患者优化自动睡眠检测算法。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 4;20(4):e0319348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319348. eCollection 2025.
年龄相关的步态生物力学变化及其对步行代谢成本的影响:美国国家老龄化研究所研讨会报告。
Exp Gerontol. 2023 Mar;173:112102. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112102. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
4
Criterion validity of ActiGraph monitoring devices for step counting and distance measurement in adults and older adults: a systematic review.计步和距离测量的 ActiGraph 监测设备在成年人和老年人中的标准效度:系统评价。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Oct 17;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01085-5.
5
Walking speed at the acute and subacute stroke stage: A descriptive meta-analysis.急性和亚急性卒中阶段的步行速度:一项描述性荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 26;13:989622. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.989622. eCollection 2022.
6
Prospective Associations of Daily Step Counts and Intensity With Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence and Mortality and All-Cause Mortality.每日步数和强度与癌症、心血管疾病发病率和死亡率及全因死亡率的前瞻性关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Nov 1;182(11):1139-1148. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.4000.
7
A catalog of validity indices for step counting wearable technologies during treadmill walking: the CADENCE-adults study.计步可穿戴技术在跑步机步行期间的有效性指标目录:CADENCE-成人研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 8;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01350-9.
8
Association of Daily Step Count and Intensity With Incident Dementia in 78 430 Adults Living in the UK.在英国,78430 名成年人中,每日步数和强度与痴呆症发病的相关性。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):1059-1063. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2672.
9
Validity of the activPAL monitor to measure stepping activity and activity intensity: A systematic review.《主动式活动监视器(activPAL)测量踏步行为和活动强度的有效性:系统评价》。
Gait Posture. 2022 Sep;97:165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
10
Accuracy and Precision of Energy Expenditure, Heart Rate, and Steps Measured by Combined-Sensing Fitbits Against Reference Measures: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.联合感应 Fitbit 测量的能量消耗、心率和步数的准确性和精密度与参考测量值的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e35626. doi: 10.2196/35626.