McCarthy Stephen D S, Majchrzak-Kita Beata, Racine Trina, Kozlowski Hannah N, Baker Darren P, Hoenen Thomas, Kobinger Gary P, Fish Eleanor N, Branch Donald R
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Advanced Diagnostics, Infection and Immunity Group, Toronto General Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jan 11;10(1):e0004364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004364. eCollection 2016 Jan.
To date there are no approved antiviral drugs for the treatment of Ebola virus disease (EVD). While a number of candidate drugs have shown limited efficacy in vitro and/or in non-human primate studies, differences in experimental methodologies make it difficult to compare their therapeutic effectiveness. Using an in vitro model of Ebola Zaire replication with transcription-competent virus like particles (trVLPs), requiring only level 2 biosafety containment, we compared the activities of the type I interferons (IFNs) IFN-α and IFN-ß, a panel of viral polymerase inhibitors (lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine (AZT) tenofovir (TFV), favipiravir (FPV), the active metabolite of brincidofovir, cidofovir (CDF)), and the estrogen receptor modulator, toremifene (TOR), in inhibiting viral replication in dose-response and time course studies. We also tested 28 two- and 56 three-drug combinations against Ebola replication. IFN-α and IFN-ß inhibited viral replication 24 hours post-infection (IC50 0.038μM and 0.016μM, respectively). 3TC, AZT and TFV inhibited Ebola replication when used alone (50-62%) or in combination (87%). They exhibited lower IC50 (0.98-6.2μM) compared with FPV (36.8μM), when administered 24 hours post-infection. Unexpectedly, CDF had a narrow therapeutic window (6.25-25μM). When dosed >50μM, CDF treatment enhanced viral infection. IFN-ß exhibited strong synergy with 3TC (97.3% inhibition) or in triple combination with 3TC and AZT (95.8% inhibition). This study demonstrates that IFNs and viral polymerase inhibitors may have utility in EVD. We identified several 2 and 3 drug combinations with strong anti-Ebola activity, confirmed in studies using fully infectious ZEBOV, providing a rationale for testing combination therapies in animal models of lethal Ebola challenge. These studies open up new possibilities for novel therapeutic options, in particular combination therapies, which could prevent and treat Ebola infection and potentially reduce drug resistance.
迄今为止,尚无获批用于治疗埃博拉病毒病(EVD)的抗病毒药物。虽然一些候选药物在体外和/或非人灵长类动物研究中显示出有限的疗效,但实验方法的差异使得难以比较它们的治疗效果。我们使用埃博拉扎伊尔病毒复制的体外模型和具有转录能力的病毒样颗粒(trVLPs),该模型仅需要2级生物安全防护,在剂量反应和时间进程研究中比较了I型干扰素(IFN)IFN-α和IFN-β、一组病毒聚合酶抑制剂(拉米夫定(3TC)、齐多夫定(AZT)、替诺福韦(TFV)、法匹拉韦(FPV)、布林西多福韦的活性代谢物西多福韦(CDF))以及雌激素受体调节剂托瑞米芬(TOR)抑制病毒复制的活性。我们还测试了2及3种药物的28种组合对埃博拉病毒复制的作用。IFN-α和IFN-β在感染后24小时抑制病毒复制(IC50分别为0.038μM和0.016μM)。3TC、AZT和TFV单独使用(50%-62%)或联合使用(87%)时可抑制埃博拉病毒复制。与感染后24小时给药的FPV(36.8μM)相比,它们的IC50较低(0.98-6.2μM)。出乎意料的是,CDF的治疗窗较窄(6.25-25μM)。当剂量>50μM时,CDF治疗会增强病毒感染。IFN-β与3TC(抑制率97.3%)或与3TC和AZT三联使用(抑制率95.8%)表现出很强的协同作用。本研究表明,IFN和病毒聚合酶抑制剂可能对EVD有效。我们确定了几种具有强大抗埃博拉病毒活性的2药和3药组合,在使用完全感染性ZEBOV的研究中得到证实,为在致死性埃博拉病毒攻击动物模型中测试联合疗法提供了理论依据。这些研究为新型治疗选择,特别是联合疗法开辟了新的可能性,联合疗法可以预防和治疗埃博拉病毒感染,并可能降低耐药性。