Dequeker Elisabeth M C, Keppens Cleo, Egele Caroline, Delen Sofie, Lamy Aude, Lemoine Antoinette, Sabourin Jean-Christophe, Andrieu Catherine, Ligtenberg Marjolijn, Fetique Dominique, Tops Bastiaan, Descarpentries Clotilde, Blons Hélène, Denoux Yves, Aube Cécile, Penault-Llorca Frederique, Hofman Paul, Leroy Karen, Le Marechal Cédric, Doucet Laurent, Duranton-Tanneur Valérie, Pedeutour Florence, Soubeyran Isabelle, Côté Jean-François, Emile Jean-François, Vignaud Jean-Michel, Monhoven Nathalie, Haddad Véronique, Laurent-Puig Pierre, van Krieken Han, Nowak Frederique, Lonchamp Etienne, Bellocq Jean-Pierre, Rouleau Etienne
Biomedical Quality Assurance Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Biomedical Quality Assurance Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Mol Diagn. 2016 Mar;18(2):205-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.09.004. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
Personalized medicine has gained increasing importance in clinical oncology, and several clinically important biomarkers are implemented in routine practice. In an effort to guarantee high quality of molecular testing in France, three subsequent external quality assessment rounds were organized at the initiative of the National Cancer Institute between 2012 and 2014. The schemes included clinically relevant biomarkers for metastatic colorectal (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, microsatellite instability) and non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, ERBB2), and they represent the first multigene/multicancer studies throughout Europe. In total, 56 laboratories coordinated by 28 regional molecular centers participated in the schemes. Laboratories received formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples and were asked to use routine methods for molecular testing to predict patient response to targeted therapies. They were encouraged to return results within 14 calendar days after sample receipt. Both genotyping and reporting were evaluated separately. During the three external quality assessment rounds, mean genotype scores were all above the preset standard of 90% for all biomarkers. Participants were mainly challenged in case of rare insertions or deletions. Assessment of the written reports showed substantial progress between the external quality assessment schemes on multiple criteria. Several essential elements such as the clinical interpretation of test results and the reason for testing still require improvement by continued external quality assessment education.
个性化医疗在临床肿瘤学中日益重要,一些具有临床重要意义的生物标志物已应用于常规实践。为确保法国分子检测的高质量,2012年至2014年期间,国家癌症研究所在其倡议下组织了三轮后续外部质量评估。这些方案包括用于转移性结直肠癌(KRAS、NRAS、BRAF、PIK3CA、微卫星不稳定性)和非小细胞肺癌(EGFR、KRAS、BRAF、PIK3CA、ERBB2)的临床相关生物标志物,它们代表了欧洲首个多基因/多癌症研究。共有由28个区域分子中心协调的56个实验室参与了这些方案。实验室收到福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋的样本,并被要求使用常规分子检测方法来预测患者对靶向治疗的反应。鼓励他们在收到样本后的14个日历日内返回结果。基因分型和报告分别进行评估。在三轮外部质量评估中,所有生物标志物的平均基因型得分均高于预设的90%标准。参与者在遇到罕见插入或缺失情况时面临主要挑战。对书面报告的评估表明,在多个标准的外部质量评估方案之间取得了实质性进展。一些关键要素,如检测结果的临床解释和检测原因,仍需要通过持续的外部质量评估教育加以改进。