Keppens Cleo, Schuuring Ed, Dequeker Elisabeth Mc
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Biomedical Quality Assurance Research Unit, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35d, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Oct 18;10(10):837. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10100837.
Laboratories testing predictive biomarkers in lung and colorectal cancer are advised to participate in external quality assessment (EQA) schemes. This study aimed to investigate which corrective actions were taken by laboratories if predetermined performance criteria were not met, to ultimately improve current test practices. EQA participants from the European Society of Pathology between 2014 and 2018 for lung and colorectal cancer were contacted, if they had at least one analysis error or test failure in the provided cases, to complete a survey. For 72.4% of 514 deviating EQA results, an appropriate action was performed, most often including staff training (15.2%) and protocol revisions (14.6%). Main assigned persons were the molecular biologist (40.0%) and pathologist (46.5%). A change in test method or the use of complex techniques, such as next-generation sequencing, required more training and the involvement of dedicated personnel to reduce future test failures. The majority of participants adhered to ISO 15189 and implemented suitable actions by designated staff, not limited to accredited laboratories. However, for 27.6% of cases (by 20 laboratories) no corrective action was taken, especially for pre-analytic problems and complex techniques. The surveys were feasible to request information on results follow-up and further recommendations were provided.
建议检测肺癌和结直肠癌预测生物标志物的实验室参加外部质量评估(EQA)计划。本研究旨在调查实验室在未达到预定性能标准时采取了哪些纠正措施,以最终改进当前的检测方法。如果2014年至2018年间欧洲病理学会的EQA参与者在提供的病例中至少有一次分析错误或检测失败,就会联系他们以完成一项调查。对于514个偏离的EQA结果中的72.4%,采取了适当的措施,最常见的包括人员培训(15.2%)和方案修订(14.6%)。主要责任人是分子生物学家(40.0%)和病理学家(46.5%)。检测方法的改变或复杂技术(如下一代测序)的使用需要更多培训以及专门人员的参与,以减少未来的检测失败。大多数参与者遵守ISO 15189标准,并由指定人员采取了适当措施,这并不局限于认可实验室。然而,对于27.6%的病例(20个实验室)未采取纠正措施,尤其是对于分析前问题和复杂技术。这些调查对于获取结果跟进信息是可行的,并提供了进一步的建议。