Bayram Yavuz, Karaca Ender, Coban Akdemir Zeynep, Yilmaz Elif Ozdamar, Tayfun Gulsen Akay, Aydin Hatip, Torun Deniz, Bozdogan Sevcan Tug, Gezdirici Alper, Isikay Sedat, Atik Mehmed M, Gambin Tomasz, Harel Tamar, El-Hattab Ayman W, Charng Wu-Lin, Pehlivan Davut, Jhangiani Shalini N, Muzny Donna M, Karaman Ali, Celik Tamer, Yuregir Ozge Ozalp, Yildirim Timur, Bayhan Ilhan A, Boerwinkle Eric, Gibbs Richard A, Elcioglu Nursel, Tuysuz Beyhan, Lupski James R
J Clin Invest. 2016 Feb;126(2):762-78. doi: 10.1172/JCI84457. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
Arthrogryposis, defined as congenital joint contractures in 2 or more body areas, is a clinical sign rather than a specific disease diagnosis. To date, more than 400 different disorders have been described that present with arthrogryposis, and variants of more than 220 genes have been associated with these disorders; however, the underlying molecular etiology remains unknown in the considerable majority of these cases.
We performed whole exome sequencing (WES) of 52 patients with clinical presentation of arthrogryposis from 48 different families.
Affected individuals from 17 families (35.4%) had variants in known arthrogryposis-associated genes, including homozygous variants of cholinergic γ nicotinic receptor (CHRNG, 6 subjects) and endothelin converting enzyme-like 1 (ECEL1, 4 subjects). Deleterious variants in candidate arthrogryposis-causing genes (fibrillin 3 [FBN3], myosin IXA [MYO9A], and pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3 [PSD3]) were identified in 3 families (6.2%). Moreover, in 8 families with a homozygous mutation in an arthrogryposis-associated gene, we identified a second locus with either a homozygous or compound heterozygous variant in a candidate gene (myosin binding protein C, fast type [MYBPC2] and vacuolar protein sorting 8 [VPS8], 2 families, 4.2%) or in another disease-associated genes (6 families, 12.5%), indicating a potential mutational burden contributing to disease expression.
In 58.3% of families, the arthrogryposis manifestation could be explained by a molecular diagnosis; however, the molecular etiology in subjects from 20 families remained unsolved by WES. Only 5 of these 20 unrelated subjects had a clinical presentation consistent with amyoplasia; a phenotype not thought to be of genetic origin. Our results indicate that increased use of genome-wide technologies will provide opportunities to better understand genetic models for diseases and molecular mechanisms of genetically heterogeneous disorders, such as arthrogryposis.
This work was supported in part by US National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) grant U54HG006542 to the Baylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics, and US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) grant R01NS058529 to J.R. Lupski.
先天性多发性关节挛缩症被定义为身体两个或更多部位的先天性关节挛缩,它是一种临床体征而非特定的疾病诊断。迄今为止,已描述了400多种不同的疾病会出现先天性多发性关节挛缩症,超过220个基因的变异与这些疾病相关;然而,在这些病例中的绝大多数,潜在的分子病因仍不清楚。
我们对来自48个不同家庭的52例有先天性多发性关节挛缩症临床表现的患者进行了全外显子组测序(WES)。
17个家庭(35.4%)的受累个体在已知的先天性多发性关节挛缩症相关基因中有变异,包括胆碱能γ烟碱受体(CHRNG,6例)和内皮素转化酶样1(ECEL1,4例)的纯合变异。在3个家庭(6.2%)中鉴定出候选先天性多发性关节挛缩症致病基因(原纤蛋白3 [FBN3]、肌球蛋白IXA [MYO9A]和含pleckstrin和Sec7结构域3 [PSD3])中的有害变异。此外,在8个先天性多发性关节挛缩症相关基因存在纯合突变的家庭中,我们在一个候选基因(快速型肌球蛋白结合蛋白C [MYBPC2]和液泡蛋白分选8 [VPS8],2个家庭,4.2%)或另一个疾病相关基因(6个家庭,12.5%)中鉴定出第二个位点存在纯合或复合杂合变异,表明存在潜在的突变负荷导致疾病表达。
在58.3%的家庭中,先天性多发性关节挛缩症的表现可以通过分子诊断来解释;然而,WES未能解决20个家庭中个体的分子病因。这20个无关个体中只有5例临床表现符合先天性肌无力;一种不被认为是遗传起源的表型。我们的结果表明,更多地使用全基因组技术将为更好地理解疾病的遗传模型和遗传性异质性疾病(如先天性多发性关节挛缩症)的分子机制提供机会。
本研究部分得到美国国家人类基因组研究所(NHGRI)/国家心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)授予贝勒 - 霍普金斯孟德尔基因组学中心的U54HG006542资助,以及美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所(NINDS)授予J.R. 卢普斯基的R01NS058529资助。