What's Not Being Discussed, or Considered, in Science Publishing?
作者信息
Teixeira da Silva Jaime A
机构信息
Kagawa-ken, Japan,
出版信息
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2015 Dec 1;16(2):130-2. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.928. eCollection 2015 Dec.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
What's Not Being Discussed, or Considered, in Science Publishing?
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2015 Dec 1;16(2):130-2. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.928. eCollection 2015 Dec.
2
What's hot, what's not.
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001 Spring;24(4):321-2. doi: 10.1037/h0095074.
3
The Journal of Surgical Research increases its science citation index: what's the impact?
J Surg Res. 2003 Oct;114(2):107-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2003.08.005.
4
Journal policies on conflict of interest: if this is the therapy, what's the disease?
Psychother Psychosom. 2001 May-Jun;70(3):115-7. doi: 10.1159/000056236.
5
Publishing in an ASPET Journal - What's in It for You?
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2018 Apr;365(1):94-95. doi: 10.1124/jpet.117.248534.
6
A commentary on the evolution of NIH: what's in, what's out, what's hot, what's not.
Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1998 Apr-Jun;33(2):115-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02688652.
7
Publishing in an ASPET Journal - What's in It for You?
Drug Metab Dispos. 2018 Apr;46(4):440-441. doi: 10.1124/dmd.117.081034.
8
Cardiovascular product update and evaluation. What's hot, what's not, what's in, what's out.
J Interv Cardiol. 1994 Apr;7(2):203-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.1994.tb00905.x.
9
Cardiovascular product update and evaluation. What's hot, what's not, what's in, what's out.
J Interv Cardiol. 1992 Mar;5(1):67-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.1992.tb00827.x.
10
Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):209-10. doi: 10.1038/421209b.
引用本文的文献
1
Retractions in orthopaedic research: A systematic review.
Bone Joint Res. 2016 Jun;5(6):263-8. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.56.BJR-2016-0047.
2
Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Oct;22(5):1457-1472. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
本文引用的文献
1
Negative results: negative perceptions limit their potential for increasing reproducibility.
J Negat Results Biomed. 2015 Jul 7;14:12. doi: 10.1186/s12952-015-0033-9.
2
Publishing: The peer-review scam.
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):480-2. doi: 10.1038/515480a.
3
Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review.
Account Res. 2015;22(1):22-40. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.899909.
4
Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle.
Nature. 2013 Nov 28;503(7477):454-7. doi: 10.1038/503454a.
Zotero 插件