Suppr超能文献

骨科研究中的撤稿:一项系统综述。

Retractions in orthopaedic research: A systematic review.

作者信息

Yan J, MacDonald A, Baisi L-P, Evaniew N, Bhandari M, Ghert M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Division of Orthopaedics, HGH 8N06, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.

Michael G. Degroote School of Medicine, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.

出版信息

Bone Joint Res. 2016 Jun;5(6):263-8. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.56.BJR-2016-0047.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Despite the fact that research fraud and misconduct are under scrutiny in the field of orthopaedic research, little systematic work has been done to uncover and characterise the underlying reasons for academic retractions in this field. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of retractions and identify the reasons for retracted publications in the orthopaedic literature.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (1995 to current) using MeSH keyword headings and the 'retracted' filter. We also searched an independent website that reports and archives retracted scientific publications (www.retractionwatch.com). Two reviewers independently extracted data including reason for retraction, study type, journal impact factor, and country of origin.

RESULTS

One hundred and ten retracted studies were included for data extraction. The retracted studies were published in journals with impact factors ranging from 0.000 (discontinued journals) to 13.262. In the 20-year search window, only 25 papers were retracted in the first ten years, with the remaining 85 papers retracted in the most recent decade. The most common reasons for retraction were fraudulent data (29), plagiarism (25) and duplicate publication (20). Retracted articles have been cited up to 165 times (median 6; interquartile range 2 to 19).

CONCLUSION

The rate of retractions in the orthopaedic literature is increasing, with the majority of retractions attributed to academic misconduct and fraud. Orthopaedic retractions originate from numerous journals and countries, indicating that misconduct issues are widespread. The results of this study highlight the need to address academic integrity when training the next generation of orthopaedic investigators.Cite this article: J. Yan, A. MacDonald, L-P. Baisi, N. Evaniew, M. Bhandari, M. Ghert. Retractions in orthopaedic research: A systematic review. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:263-268. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.56.BJR-2016-0047.

摘要

目的

尽管骨科研究领域的研究欺诈和不当行为受到了审查,但在揭示和描述该领域学术论文撤稿的潜在原因方面,几乎没有开展系统的工作。本研究的目的是确定撤稿率,并找出骨科文献中撤稿论文的原因。

方法

两名评审员使用医学主题词(MeSH)关键词和“撤稿”过滤器,独立检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆(1995年至今)。我们还搜索了一个独立的网站,该网站报告并存档撤稿的科学出版物(www.retractionwatch.com)。两名评审员独立提取数据,包括撤稿原因、研究类型、期刊影响因子和原产国。

结果

纳入110篇撤稿研究进行数据提取。撤稿研究发表在影响因子从0.000(已停刊的期刊)到13.262的期刊上。在20年的检索期内,前十五年仅有25篇论文被撤稿,其余85篇论文在最近十年被撤稿。撤稿的最常见原因是数据造假(29篇)、抄袭(25篇)和重复发表(20篇)。撤稿文章被引用多达165次(中位数6次;四分位间距2至19次)。

结论

骨科文献中的撤稿率正在上升,大多数撤稿归因于学术不端行为和欺诈。骨科撤稿来自众多期刊和国家,表明不当行为问题普遍存在。本研究结果强调了在培养下一代骨科研究人员时处理学术诚信问题的必要性。引用本文:J. Yan、A. MacDonald、L-P. Baisi、N. Evaniew、M. Bhandari、M. Ghert。骨科研究中的撤稿:系统评价。《骨关节研究》2016年;5:263 - 268。DOI:10.130

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cab/4957175/1b56e516080b/bonejointres-05-263-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验