de Winter J C F, Dodou D, Wieringa P A
a Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering , Delft University of Technology , The Netherlands.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;44(2):147-81. doi: 10.1080/00273170902794206.
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is generally regarded as a technique for large sample sizes (N), with N = 50 as a reasonable absolute minimum. This study offers a comprehensive overview of the conditions in which EFA can yield good quality results for N below 50. Simulations were carried out to estimate the minimum required N for different levels of loadings (λ), number of factors (f), and number of variables (p) and to examine the extent to which a small N solution can sustain the presence of small distortions such as interfactor correlations, model error, secondary loadings, unequal loadings, and unequal p/f. Factor recovery was assessed in terms of pattern congruence coefficients, factor score correlations, Heywood cases, and the gap size between eigenvalues. A subsampling study was also conducted on a psychological dataset of individuals who filled in a Big Five Inventory via the Internet. Results showed that when data are well conditioned (i.e., high λ, low f, high p), EFA can yield reliable results for N well below 50, even in the presence of small distortions. Such conditions may be uncommon but should certainly not be ruled out in behavioral research data. ∗ These authors contributed equally to this work.
探索性因素分析(EFA)通常被视为一种适用于大样本量(N)的技术,N = 50被认为是合理的绝对最小值。本研究全面概述了在N低于50的情况下EFA能够产生高质量结果的条件。进行了模拟,以估计不同载荷水平(λ)、因素数量(f)和变量数量(p)所需的最小N,并检验小N解决方案能够承受诸如因素间相关性、模型误差、二次载荷、不等载荷和不等p/f等小偏差存在的程度。根据模式一致性系数、因素得分相关性、海伍德情况以及特征值之间的差距大小来评估因素恢复情况。还对通过互联网填写大五人格量表的个体的心理数据集进行了子抽样研究。结果表明,当数据条件良好时(即高λ、低f、高p),即使存在小偏差,EFA对于远低于50的N也能产生可靠的结果。这种情况可能不常见,但在行为研究数据中肯定不应被排除。∗ 这些作者对这项工作贡献相同。