Jung Sunho, Seo Dong Gi, Park Jungkyu
School of Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Psychology, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 9;11:507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00507. eCollection 2020.
Several methods of factor extraction have recently gained popularity as a procedure for dealing with estimation problems associated with small sample sizes, which can be found in the various behavioral science disciplines, such as comparative psychology and behavior genetics. Two popular approaches for particularly small samples (below 50) include unweighted least squares factor analysis (ULS-FA) and regularized exploratory factor analysis (REFA). However, it is unclear how well each of the approaches performs with small samples in the context of exploratory bifactor modeling. In the current study, a comprehensive simulation study was conducted to evaluate the small sample behavior of the two approaches in terms of bifactor structure recovery under different sample size, factor loading, number of variables per factor, number of factors, and factor correlation experimental conditions. The results show that REFA is recommended for use over ULS-FA, particularly in the conditions involving low factor loadings, few group factors, or a small number of variables per factor.
最近,几种因子提取方法作为处理与小样本量相关的估计问题的程序而受到欢迎,这些小样本量问题在各种行为科学学科中都可能出现,比如比较心理学和行为遗传学。对于特别小的样本(低于50),两种流行的方法包括未加权最小二乘因子分析(ULS-FA)和正则化探索性因子分析(REFA)。然而,在探索性双因子建模的背景下,尚不清楚每种方法在小样本情况下的表现如何。在当前的研究中进行了一项全面的模拟研究,以评估这两种方法在不同样本量、因子载荷、每个因子的变量数量、因子数量和因子相关性实验条件下,在双因子结构恢复方面的小样本行为。结果表明,推荐使用REFA而非ULS-FA,特别是在涉及低因子载荷、少数组因子或每个因子变量数量较少的条件下。