• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项随机试验发现,辅以邮寄提醒的在线问卷能产生具有成本效益且可推广的样本,但别忘了提醒这一步。

A randomized trial found online questionnaires supplemented by postal reminders generated a cost-effective and generalizable sample but don't forget the reminders.

作者信息

Loban Amanda, Mandefield Laura, Hind Daniel, Bradburn Mike

机构信息

Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.

Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;92:116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.003
PMID:28844786
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the response rates, data completeness, and representativeness of survey data produced by online and postal surveys.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A randomized trial nested within a cohort study in Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Participants were randomized to receive either an electronic (online) survey questionnaire with paper reminder (N = 2,982) or paper questionnaire with electronic reminder (N = 2,855).

RESULTS

Response rates were similar for electronic contact and postal contacts (50.9% vs. 49.7%, difference = 1.2%, 95% confidence interval: -1.3% to 3.8%). The characteristics of those responding to the two groups were similar. Participants nevertheless demonstrated an overwhelming preference for postal questionnaires, with the majority responding by post in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Online survey questionnaire systems need to be supplemented with a postal reminder to achieve acceptable uptake, but doing so provides a similar response rate and case mix when compared to postal questionnaires alone. For large surveys, online survey systems may be cost saving.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较在线调查和邮寄调查所产生的调查数据的回复率、数据完整性和代表性。

研究设计与设置

一项嵌套于英国约克郡队列研究中的随机试验。参与者被随机分配接受带有纸质提醒的电子(在线)调查问卷(N = 2982)或带有电子提醒的纸质调查问卷(N = 2855)。

结果

电子联系方式和邮寄联系方式的回复率相似(50.9%对49.7%,差值 = 1.2%,95%置信区间:-1.3%至3.8%)。两组回复者的特征相似。然而,参与者对邮寄问卷表现出压倒性的偏好,两组中的大多数人都通过邮寄方式回复。

结论

在线调查问卷系统需要辅以邮寄提醒以实现可接受的参与率,但与仅使用邮寄问卷相比,这样做能提供相似的回复率和病例组合。对于大型调查,在线调查系统可能节省成本。

相似文献

1
A randomized trial found online questionnaires supplemented by postal reminders generated a cost-effective and generalizable sample but don't forget the reminders.一项随机试验发现,辅以邮寄提醒的在线问卷能产生具有成本效益且可推广的样本,但别忘了提醒这一步。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;92:116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.在SUSPEND试验中,通过短信预通知和发送提醒电子邮件来提高邮寄问卷的回复率:析因设计随机对照试验
Trials. 2015 Jul 8;16:295. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0808-9.
3
Electronic reminders did not improve postal questionnaire response rates or response times: a randomized controlled trial.电子提醒并未提高邮寄问卷的回复率或回复时间:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):1001-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.013. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
4
E-mail invitations to general practitioners were as effective as postal invitations and were more efficient.电子邮件邀请全科医生与邮寄邀请同样有效,且更有效率。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;65(7):793-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.010. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
5
A comparison of data quality and practicality of online versus postal questionnaires in a sample of testicular cancer survivors.对睾丸癌幸存者样本中在线问卷和邮寄问卷的数据质量和实用性的比较。
Psychooncology. 2013 Jan;22(1):233-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.2052. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
6
Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? two randomised controlled trials.激励措施、提醒或减轻负担是否能提高邮政问卷调查中医疗保健专业人员的回复率?两项随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 14;12:250. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-250.
7
A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.一项关于使用患者乳腺护理体验问卷的邮寄调查与混合模式调查的比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 27;13(3):e68. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1241.
8
Getting a Valid Survey Response From 662 Plastic Surgeons in the 21st Century.在21世纪从662名整形外科医生那里获得有效的调查反馈。
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;76(1):3-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000546.
9
Effects of a financial incentive on health researchers' response to an online survey: a randomized controlled trial.经济激励对健康研究人员在线调查回复率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 May 10;12(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1251.
10
Improving follow-up survey completion rates through pilot interventions in the All of Us Research Program: Results from a non-randomized intervention study.通过在“所有人研究计划”中进行试点干预来提高随访调查完成率:一项非随机干预研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 15;19(10):e0308995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308995. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of chronic pain in the Spanish population. Results from the pain barometer.西班牙人群慢性疼痛的患病率及流行病学特征。疼痛晴雨表的结果。
Eur J Pain. 2025 Jan;29(1):e4705. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4705. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
2
Randomised trials conducted using cohorts: a scoping review.使用队列进行的随机试验:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e075601. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075601.
3
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
4
The anticoagulation length of therapy and risk of new adverse events in venous thromboembolism (ALTERNATIVE) study: Design and survey results.抗凝治疗时间和静脉血栓栓塞症新不良事件风险(ALTERNATIVE)研究:设计和调查结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 8;17(12):e0277961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277961. eCollection 2022.
5
Learning from COVID-19 related trial adaptations to inform efficient trial design-a sequential mixed methods study.从 COVID-19 相关试验调整中学习以提供高效的试验设计:一项序贯混合方法研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 29;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01609-6.
6
Factors affecting adolescents' participation in randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of healthcare interventions: the case of the STEPSTONES project.影响青少年参与评估医疗干预措施有效性的随机对照试验的因素:以 STEPSTONES 项目为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Aug 3;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01088-7.
7
Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for COPD: a cluster randomised controlled 'study within a trial' (SWAT) of a multimedia information resource.提高一项 COPD 远程医疗管理研究的招募率:一项多媒体信息资源的群组随机对照“试验内研究”(SWAT)。
Trials. 2019 Jul 24;20(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3496-z.
8
Use of Online or Paper Surveys by Australian Women: Longitudinal Study of Users, Devices, and Cohort Retention.澳大利亚女性对在线或纸质调查问卷的使用:用户、设备及队列留存情况的纵向研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 14;21(3):e10672. doi: 10.2196/10672.