Tan Donald, Ang Marcus, Arundhati Anshu, Khor Wei-Boon
Singapore National Eye Centre Singapore Eye Research Institute National University Health System, Singapore Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Singapore National Eye Centre Singapore Eye Research Institute.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2015;113:T10.
To evaluate outcomes of anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) and endothelial keratoplasty (EK) within the Singapore Corneal Transplant Study (SCTS), with the hypothesis that both ALK and EK are able to provide equivalent or improved clinical outcomes, compared to penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and to determine changing trends globally with other international databases.
Clinical data on all transplants performed was derived from our SCTS database, a prospective national keratoplasty registry, and clinical outcomes (graft survival, endothelial cell loss, complications, visual acuity) were compared between PK, ALK, and EK. Global trends on indications and forms of keratoplasty performed in 2011/2012 were obtained from national keratoplasty or eye banking registries, corneal/ophthalmological societies, national eye banks, and national ophthalmic institutions.
Global rates of EK surgery vary widely, from 52% (Sweden) to 0% (South Africa), with higher adoption by industrialized countries. ALK adoption rates similarly vary from 28.7% (China) to 1.0% (Philippines). SCTS data show high adoption rates in Singapore: EK 44% and ALK 28%. Our surgical modifications to big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) surgery resulted in visual outcomes matching PK, and a low conversion to PK of 2.1%, whereas our evolving approaches to donor insertion in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) show significant reduction in 1-year postoperative endothelial cell loss rates from 60% (folding), to 22% to 30% (Sheets Glide), to 15% (EndoGlide inserter).
Improvements in various forms of ALK and EK surgery can lead to better visual outcomes, longer graft survival, and reduced complications, as compared to PK. Global trends suggest adoption of these procedures at different rates.
在新加坡角膜移植研究(SCTS)中评估前板层角膜移植术(ALK)和内皮角膜移植术(EK)的疗效,假设与穿透性角膜移植术(PK)相比,ALK和EK均能提供同等或更好的临床疗效,并与其他国际数据库一起确定全球范围内的变化趋势。
所有移植手术的临床数据来自我们的SCTS数据库,这是一个前瞻性的国家角膜移植登记处,比较了PK、ALK和EK之间的临床疗效(植片存活率、内皮细胞丢失、并发症、视力)。2011/2012年进行的角膜移植术的适应证和形式的全球趋势来自国家角膜移植或眼库登记处、角膜/眼科协会、国家眼库和国家眼科机构。
EK手术的全球发生率差异很大,从52%(瑞典)到0%(南非),工业化国家的采用率更高。ALK的采用率同样从28.7%(中国)到1.0%(菲律宾)不等。SCTS数据显示新加坡的采用率很高:EK为44%,ALK为28%。我们对大泡深前板层角膜移植术(DALK)手术的改良导致视力结果与PK相当,转为PK的比例低至2.1%,而我们在Descemet膜剥脱自动内皮角膜移植术(DSAEK)中不断改进的供体植入方法显示,术后1年内内皮细胞丢失率从60%(折叠式)显著降低至22%至30%(片状滑行式),再到15%(EndoGlide植入器)。
与PK相比,各种形式的ALK和EK手术的改进可带来更好的视力结果、更长的植片存活时间并减少并发症。全球趋势表明这些手术的采用率各不相同。