Suppr超能文献

一项关于颈椎前路手术后10年相邻节段疾病翻修手术患者临床结局的研究。

A study on the clinical outcomes of patients with revision surgery for adjacent segment disease after 10-year's anterior cervical spine surgery.

作者信息

Li Jia, Tong Tong, Niu Ruijie, Shen Yong

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.

The Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Jan 13;11:5. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0341-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) as a revision surgery for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after primary surgery.

METHODS

There were 35 patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery for symptomatic recurrent radicular or myelopathic symptoms from ASD. According to the ASD involved levels superior or inferior to the previous operated level, patients were divided into two groups: superior and inferior groups. The patients were also grouped into ACDF and ACCF groups by who received ACDF or ACCF as revision surgery for ASD. Clinical evaluations were performed preoperatively and repeated at 2 years after operation.

RESULTS

In this study, a total of 35 patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up data were available for analysis. There were 20 patients in the superior group and 15 patients in the inferior group according to the ASD developed at levels. Of these 35 patients, according to the treatment method, 12 patients were in the ACCF group and 23 patients were in the ACDF group. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and visual analogue scale (VAS) on arm pain and neck pain scores demonstrated significant improvement compared to the preoperative scores in both groups (superior and inferior groups or ACDF and ACCF groups) (P < 0.05). However, there was no difference between the two groups (superior and inferior groups or ACDF and ACCF groups) (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our study, both superior and inferior adjacent-level groups together with ACDF and ACCF groups maintained favorable clinical results on patients who underwent one-level ACDF for symptomatic new radicular or myelopathic symptoms.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)或颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)作为初次手术后相邻节段疾病(ASD)翻修手术的临床疗效。

方法

35例因ASD出现症状性复发性神经根性或脊髓病症状而接受颈椎前路手术的患者。根据ASD累及的节段位于先前手术节段的上方或下方,将患者分为两组:上方组和下方组。患者还根据接受ACDF或ACCF作为ASD翻修手术分为ACDF组和ACCF组。术前进行临床评估,并在术后2年重复评估。

结果

本研究共有35例患者至少有2年的随访数据可供分析。根据ASD发生的节段,上方组20例,下方组15例。在这35例患者中,根据治疗方法,ACCF组12例,ACDF组23例。两组(上方组和下方组或ACDF组和ACCF组)的日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)以及手臂疼痛和颈部疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分与术前评分相比均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。然而,两组(上方组和下方组或ACDF组和ACCF组)之间没有差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

根据我们的研究,上方和下方相邻节段组以及ACDF组和ACCF组对因症状性新的神经根性或脊髓病症状接受单节段ACDF手术的患者均保持了良好的临床效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e87/4710976/4d5d03d61f99/13018_2016_341_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验