Suppr超能文献

双节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除术与单节段椎体次全切除术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的对比

Two-level anterior cervical discectomy versus one-level corpectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

作者信息

Oh Min Chul, Zhang Ho Yeol, Park Jeong Yoon, Kim Keun Su

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 1;34(7):692-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318199690a.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective investigation of clinical and radiologic outcomes after surgical treatment for 2-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

OBJECTIVE

The study was undertaken to compare the outcomes of 2 different anterior approach types for 2-level CSM. Specifically, 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) was compared with 1-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal surgical approach for 2-level CSM has not been defined, and thus, the relative merits of 2-level ACDF and 1-level ACCF remain controversial. However, few comparative studies have been conducted on these 2 surgical approaches.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the case histories of 31 patients that underwent surgical treatment for 2-level CSM from 2002 to 2006. Cases of myelopathy because of cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament were excluded. Thirty-one patients (16 men and 15 women) of mean age 54.45 +/- 11.6 years (28 approximately 77) were included. The average follow-up period was 26.23 +/- 15.0 months (12 approximately 63). The authors compared perioperative parameters (hospital stays, bleeding amounts, operation times, complications), clinical parameters (Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, Visual Analog Scale scores for neck and arm pain), and radiologic parameters (total cervical range of motion, segmental range of motion, segmental height, cervical lordosis, fusion rate).

RESULTS

Of these above parameters, operation time (P = 0.001) and bleeding amount (P = 0.001) were significantly greater in the ACCF group, whereas segmental height (P = 0.018) and postoperative cervical lordosis (P = 0.009) were significantly lower in the ACCF group. However, other parameters were not significantly different in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Surgical managements of 2-level CSM using ACDF or ACCF were found to be similar in terms of clinical outcomes. However, 2-level ACDF was found to be superior to 1-level ACCF in terms of operation times, bleeding amounts, and radiologic results.

摘要

研究设计

对2节段脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)手术治疗后的临床和放射学结果进行回顾性调查。

目的

本研究旨在比较2种不同前路手术方式治疗2节段CSM的结果。具体而言,比较2节段颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与1节段颈椎椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)的结果。

背景数据总结

2节段CSM的最佳手术方式尚未确定,因此,2节段ACDF和1节段ACCF的相对优点仍存在争议。然而,针对这2种手术方式的比较研究较少。

方法

作者回顾了2002年至2006年接受2节段CSM手术治疗的31例患者的病历。排除因颈椎后纵韧带骨化导致的脊髓病病例。纳入31例患者(16例男性和15例女性),平均年龄54.45±11.6岁(28至77岁)。平均随访时间为26.23±15.0个月(12至63个月)。作者比较了围手术期参数(住院时间、出血量、手术时间、并发症)、临床参数(日本骨科协会评分、颈部和手臂疼痛的视觉模拟量表评分)以及放射学参数(颈椎总活动度、节段活动度、节段高度、颈椎前凸、融合率)。

结果

在上述参数中,ACCF组的手术时间(P = 0.001)和出血量(P = 0.001)显著更多,而ACCF组的节段高度(P = 0.018)和术后颈椎前凸(P = 0.009)显著更低。然而,两组的其他参数无显著差异。

结论

发现使用ACDF或ACCF治疗2节段CSM的手术管理在临床结果方面相似。然而,在手术时间、出血量和放射学结果方面,2节段ACDF优于1节段ACCF。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验