Kim Chang-Hee, Kim Yong Gyu, Shin Jung Eun, Yang Young Soo, Im Donghyuk
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro (Hwayang-dong), Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 143-729, Republic of Korea.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Oct;273(10):3003-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3894-8. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Accurate lateralization is important to improve treatment outcomes in horizontal semicircular canal (HSCC) benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). To determine the involved side in HSCC-BPPV, the intensity of nystagmus has been compared in a head-roll test (HRT) and the direction of nystagmus was evaluated in a bow and lean test (BLT). The aim of this study is to compare the results of a BLT with those of a HRT for lateralization of HSCC-canalolithiasis and cupulopathy (heavy cupula and light cupula), and evaluate treatment outcomes in patients with HSCC-canalolithiasis. We conducted retrospective case reviews in 66 patients with HSCC-canalolithiasis and 63 patients with HSCC-cupulopathy. The affected side was identified as the direction of bowing nystagmus on BLT in 55 % (36 of 66) of patients with canalolithiasis, which was concordant with the HRT result in 67 % (24 of 36) of cases (concordant group). Lateralization was determined by comparison of nystagmus intensity during HRT in 30 patients who did not show bowing or leaning nystagmus. The remission rate after the first treatment was 71 % (17 of 24) in the concordant group and 45 % (5 of 11) in the discordant group. Both bowing and leaning nystagmus were observed in all patients with cupulopathy, and the side of the null plane was identified as the affected side. In conclusion, bowing and/or leaning nystagmus were observed in only 55 % of patients with HSCC-canalolithiasis, and the first treatment based on the result of BLT alone was effective in only 45 % of the patients in whom the BLT and HRT were discordant, which may suggest that the usefulness of BLT in lateralizing the HSCC-canalolithiasis may be limited.
准确判断患侧对于改善水平半规管(HSCC)良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)的治疗效果至关重要。为确定HSCC-BPPV的患侧,在摇头试验(HRT)中比较了眼震强度,并在鞠躬和倾斜试验(BLT)中评估了眼震方向。本研究的目的是比较BLT与HRT在HSCC管结石症和嵴顶病变(重嵴帽和轻嵴帽)患侧判断上的结果,并评估HSCC管结石症患者的治疗效果。我们对66例HSCC管结石症患者和63例HSCC嵴顶病变患者进行了回顾性病例分析。在55%(66例中的36例)的管结石症患者中,患侧被确定为BLT时鞠躬性眼震的方向,其中67%(36例中的24例)与HRT结果一致(一致组)。在30例未出现鞠躬或倾斜性眼震的患者中,通过比较HRT期间的眼震强度来确定患侧。一致组首次治疗后的缓解率为71%(24例中的17例),不一致组为45%(11例中的5例)。在所有嵴顶病变患者中均观察到鞠躬和倾斜性眼震,零平面一侧被确定为患侧。总之,仅55%的HSCC管结石症患者观察到鞠躬和/或倾斜性眼震,仅基于BLT结果的首次治疗在BLT和HRT结果不一致的患者中仅45%有效,这可能表明BLT在HSCC管结石症患侧判断中的作用可能有限。