van Sluijs Esther M F, Sharp Stephen J, Ambrosini Gina L, Cassidy Aedin, Griffin Simon J, Ekelund Ulf
1School of Clinical Medicine,Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit & UK Clinical Research Collaboration (CRC) Centre for Diet and Activity Research,University of Cambridge,Cambridge CB2 0QQ,UK.
2Medical Research Council Human Nutrition Research,Cambridge CB1 9NL,UK.
Br J Nutr. 2016 Mar 14;115(5):921-9. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515005097. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
There is limited evidence on the prospective association of time spent in activity intensity (sedentary (SED), moderate (MPA) or vigorous (VPA) physical activity) and dietary intake with adiposity indicators in young people. This study aimed to assess associations between (1) baseline objectively measured activity intensity, dietary energy density (DED) and 4-year change in adiposity and (2) 4-year change in activity intensity/DED and adiposity at follow-up. We conducted cohort analyses including 367 participants (10 years at baseline, 14 years at follow-up) with valid data for objectively measured activity (Actigraph), DED (4-d food diary), anthropometry (waist circumference (WC), %body fat (%BF), fat mass index (FMI), weight status) and covariates. Linear and logistic regression models were fit, including adjustment for DED and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Results showed that baseline DED was associated with change in WC (β for 1kJ/g difference: 0·71; 95% CI 0·26, 1·17), particularly in boys (1·26; 95% CI 0·41, 2·16 v. girls: 0·26; 95% CI -0·34, 0·87), but not with %BF, FMI or weight status. In contrast, baseline SED, MPA or VPA were not associated with any of the outcomes. Change in DED was negatively associated with FMI (β for 1kJ/g increase: -0·86; 95% CI -1·59, -0·12) and %BF (-0·86; 95% CI -1·25, -0·11) but not WC (-0·27; 95% CI -1·02, 0·48). Change in SED, MPA and VPA did not predict adiposity at follow-up. In conclusion, activity intensity was not prospectively associated with adiposity, whereas the directions of associations with DED were inconsistent. To inform public health efforts, future studies should continue to analyse longitudinal data to further understand the independent role of different energy-balance behaviours in changes in adiposity in early adolescence.
关于年轻人在不同活动强度(久坐(SED)、中等强度(MPA)或剧烈强度(VPA)身体活动)下所花费的时间以及饮食摄入量与肥胖指标之间的前瞻性关联,证据有限。本研究旨在评估:(1)基线时客观测量的活动强度、饮食能量密度(DED)与肥胖的4年变化之间的关联;(2)随访时活动强度/DED的4年变化与肥胖之间的关联。我们进行了队列分析,纳入了367名参与者(基线时10岁,随访时14岁),这些参与者有关于客观测量活动(Actigraph)、DED(4天食物日记)、人体测量学(腰围(WC)、体脂百分比(%BF)、脂肪质量指数(FMI)、体重状况)及协变量的有效数据。拟合了线性和逻辑回归模型,包括对DED和中等至剧烈身体活动的调整。结果显示,基线DED与WC的变化相关(每1kJ/g差异的β值:0·71;95%CI 0·26,1·17),在男孩中尤其如此(1·26;95%CI 0·41,2·16,女孩为:0·26;95%CI -0·34,0·87),但与%BF、FMI或体重状况无关。相比之下,基线SED、MPA或VPA与任何结果均无关联。DED的变化与FMI呈负相关(每1kJ/g增加的β值:-0·86;95%CI -1·59,-0·12)和%BF(-0·86;95%CI -1·25,-0·11),但与WC无关(-0·27;95%CI -1·02,0·48)。SED、MPA和VPA的变化并不能预测随访时的肥胖情况。总之,活动强度与肥胖无前瞻性关联,而与DED的关联方向不一致。为指导公共卫生工作,未来研究应继续分析纵向数据,以进一步了解不同能量平衡行为在青春期早期肥胖变化中的独立作用。