1Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre,Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,Sherbrooke, QC,Canada,J1M 0C8.
3Centre de développement du porc du Québec,Sainte-Foy, QC,Canada,G1V 4M7.
Animal. 2016 Jul;10(7):1137-47. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115003067. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
This study was developed to assess the impact on performance, nutrient balance, serum parameters and feeding costs resulting from the switching of conventional to precision-feeding programs for growing-finishing pigs. A total of 70 pigs (30.4±2.2 kg BW) were used in a performance trial (84 days). The five treatments used in this experiment were a three-phase group-feeding program (control) obtained with fixed blending proportions of feeds A (high nutrient density) and B (low nutrient density); against four individual daily-phase feeding programs in which the blending proportions of feeds A and B were updated daily to meet 110%, 100%, 90% or 80% of the lysine requirements estimated using a mathematical model. Feed intake was recorded automatically by a computerized device in the feeders, and the pigs were weighed weekly during the project. Body composition traits were estimated by scanning with an ultrasound device and densitometer every 28 days. Nitrogen and phosphorus excretions were calculated by the difference between retention (obtained from densitometer measurements) and intake. Feeding costs were assessed using 2013 ingredient cost data. Feed intake, feed efficiency, back fat thickness, body fat mass and serum contents of total protein and phosphorus were similar among treatments. Feeding pigs in a daily-basis program providing 110%, 100% or 90% of the estimated individual lysine requirements also did not influence BW, body protein mass, weight gain and nitrogen retention in comparison with the animals in the group-feeding program. However, feeding pigs individually with diets tailored to match 100% of nutrient requirements made it possible to reduce (P<0.05) digestible lysine intake by 26%, estimated nitrogen excretion by 30% and feeding costs by US$7.60/pig (-10%) relative to group feeding. Precision feeding is an effective approach to make pig production more sustainable without compromising growth performance.
本研究旨在评估从传统到精准饲养方案切换对生长-育肥猪的生产性能、养分平衡、血清参数和饲养成本的影响。在一项为期 84 天的性能试验中,共使用了 70 头猪(30.4±2.2kgBW)。本实验使用了五种处理方法:一种是三阶段群饲方案(对照组),采用饲料 A(高养分密度)和饲料 B(低养分密度)的固定混合比例;另外四种是个体每日阶段的饲养方案,每日更新饲料 A 和饲料 B 的混合比例,以满足使用数学模型估计的 110%、100%、90%或 80%的赖氨酸需求。饲料摄入量由饲料器中的计算机设备自动记录,项目期间每周对猪进行称重。每隔 28 天使用超声设备和密度计扫描估计体成分特征。通过密度计测量获得的保留量与摄入量之间的差异计算氮和磷的排泄量。使用 2013 年的成分成本数据评估饲养成本。在不同处理组之间,饲料采食量、饲料效率、背膘厚度、体脂肪量和血清总蛋白和磷含量没有差异。与群饲方案相比,以 110%、100%或 90%的估计个体赖氨酸需求为基础饲养猪,也不会影响 BW、体蛋白质量、增重和氮保留。然而,以满足 100%养分需求为基础的个别饲养方案可以减少(P<0.05)可消化赖氨酸摄入量 26%、估计氮排泄量 30%和饲养成本 7.60 美元/头(-10%),与群饲相比。精准饲养是一种有效的方法,可以在不影响生长性能的情况下使猪生产更可持续。