Navales Ron Aldwin S, Tokach Mike D, DeRouchey Joel M, Gaffield Katelyn N, Woodworth Jason C, Goodband Robert D, Gebhardt Jordan T, Euken Russell M, Dekkers Jack C M
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-0201, USA.
Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-0201, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf043.
This review aims to summarize the current practices producers can use to improve feed and nutrient utilization with a focus on providing critical information for use within future life cycle assessments of the swine industry. Nutrient utilization by pigs can be improved by closely meeting the nutrient requirements for maintenance, growth, and reproduction, which reduces nutrient excretion. For example, N excretion can be reduced by 8% and 3.7% for every percentage unit reduction in crude protein for growing pigs and lactating sows, respectively. Similarly, reducing excess trace minerals or replacing inorganic Cu, Zn, and Mn with lower additions of organic sources can reduce excretion by 28% to 42%, 38% to 53%, and 12% to 20%, respectively. Adoption of precision feeding strategies can lower N and P excretion by at least 11%. Ingredient selection and use of feed additives that enhance nutrient digestibility are also an important component in improving feed efficiency and nutrient utilization. The use of exogenous carbohydrase and protease can improve feed efficiency by 1.8%, while phytase can enhance P digestibility by 30% to 50%. At the feed mill, feed efficiency can be improved by 1% for every 100-µm reduction in particle size and by 8% with pelleting. At the farm, management practices such as reducing overfeeding of developing gilts and sows, increasing meal frequency, and minimizing feed wastage can also improve feed utilization. For example, feed wastage is estimated to represent 5% to 6% of total feed disappearance, and feeder type can reduce this by 1% to 10%. Lastly, non-nutritional strategies to improve feed efficiency should be considered, including genetic selection, managing thermal environment, and improving herd health. Current genetic selection results in a reduction in greenhouse gas production by 0.5% to 1.5% per year. Likewise, compared to healthy pigs, disease-challenged pigs have 6.3%, 7.9%, 7.4%, 5.8%, and 5.8% greater climate change potential, soil and water acidification potential, eutrophication potential, cumulative energy demand, and land application requirements, respectively. Currently, the swine industry primarily focuses on feed and management practices that optimize growth and minimize production costs. The challenge to future swine production will be to find emerging technologies that further reduce environmental impacts while still optimizing performance and production costs.
本综述旨在总结生产者当前可用于提高饲料和养分利用率的做法,重点是为未来养猪业生命周期评估提供关键信息。通过密切满足维持、生长和繁殖的养分需求,可以提高猪的养分利用率,从而减少养分排泄。例如,生长猪和泌乳母猪的粗蛋白每降低一个百分点,氮排泄量可分别减少8%和3.7%。同样,减少过量的微量矿物质或将无机铜、锌和锰替换为添加量较低的有机来源,可分别减少28%至42%、38%至53%和12%至20%的排泄量。采用精准饲喂策略可使氮和磷排泄量至少降低11%。选择提高养分消化率的饲料原料和使用饲料添加剂也是提高饲料效率和养分利用率的重要组成部分。使用外源碳水化合物酶和蛋白酶可使饲料效率提高1.8%,而植酸酶可使磷消化率提高30%至50%。在饲料厂,粒度每降低100微米,饲料效率可提高1%,制粒可提高8%。在养殖场,减少后备母猪和母猪的过度饲喂、增加饲喂次数以及尽量减少饲料浪费等管理措施也可提高饲料利用率。例如,饲料浪费估计占总饲料消耗量的5%至6%,而饲料槽类型可将其减少1%至10%。最后,应考虑提高饲料效率的非营养策略,包括遗传选择、控制热环境和改善猪群健康。目前的遗传选择使温室气体产量每年降低0.5%至1.5%。同样,与健康猪相比,患病猪的气候变化潜力、土壤和水酸化潜力、富营养化潜力、累计能源需求和土地施用需求分别高出6.3%、7.9%、7.4%、5.8%和5.8%。目前,养猪业主要关注优化生长和降低生产成本的饲料和管理措施。未来养猪生产面临的挑战将是找到既能进一步减少环境影响,又能优化性能和生产成本的新兴技术。