Gordon Bradley D, Bernard Kyle, Salzman Josh, Whitebird Robin R
HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Bloomington, Minnesota; University of Minnesota Medical School, Academic Health Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Advocate Christ Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;16(7):1047-51. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.9.28088. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
The objective of the study was to understand the immediate utility of health information exchange (HIE) on emergency department (ED) providers by interviewing them shortly after the information was retrieved. Prior studies of physician perceptions regarding HIE have only been performed outside of the care environment.
Trained research assistants interviewed resident physicians, physician assistants and attending physicians using a semi-structured questionnaire within two hours of making a HIE request. The responses were recorded, then transcribed for qualitative analysis. The transcribed interviews were analyzed for emerging qualitative themes.
We analyzed 40 interviews obtained from 29 providers. Primary qualitative themes discovered included the following: drivers for requests for outside information; the importance of unexpected information; historical lab values as reference points; providing context when determining whether to admit or discharge a patient; the importance of information in refining disposition; improved confidence of provider; and changes in decisions for diagnostic imaging.
ED providers are driven to use HIE when they're missing a known piece of information. This study finds two additional impacts not previously reported. First, providers sometimes find additional unanticipated useful information, supporting a workflow that lowers the threshold to request external information. Second, providers sometimes report utility when no changes to their existing plan are made as their confidence is increased based on external records. Our findings are concordant with previous studies in finding exchanged information is useful to provide context for interpreting lab results, making admission decisions, and prevents repeat diagnostic imaging.
本研究的目的是通过在检索信息后不久对急诊科(ED)医护人员进行访谈,了解健康信息交换(HIE)对他们的即时效用。先前关于医生对HIE看法的研究仅在护理环境之外进行。
训练有素的研究助理在提出HIE请求后的两小时内,使用半结构化问卷对住院医师、医师助理和主治医师进行访谈。记录回答内容,然后转录以供定性分析。对转录的访谈进行分析,以找出新出现的定性主题。
我们分析了从29名医护人员那里获得的40份访谈。发现的主要定性主题包括:请求外部信息的驱动因素;意外信息的重要性;历史实验室值作为参考点;在决定是否收治患者时提供背景信息;信息在完善处置中的重要性;医护人员信心增强;以及诊断成像决策的变化。
当ED医护人员缺少已知信息时,他们会倾向于使用HIE。本研究发现了另外两个以前未报告的影响。首先,医护人员有时会发现额外的意外有用信息,这支持了一种降低请求外部信息门槛的工作流程。其次,当医护人员基于外部记录信心增强而对现有计划未做更改时,他们有时也会报告其效用。我们的研究结果与之前的研究一致,即发现交换的信息有助于为解释实验室结果、做出收治决定提供背景信息,并避免重复进行诊断成像。