Gaski Greg, Frantz Travis, Steenburg Scott, Bell Teresa, McKinley Todd
Indiana University Health, Methodist Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University Health, Methodist Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1801 N Senate Boulevard, Suite 535, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1410-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4676-0.
Pelvic and retroperitoneal trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in multiply injured patients. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) has been criticized for underrepresenting and inaccurately defining mechanical injury. The influence of pelvic injury volume on organ dysfunction and multiple organ failure (MOF) has not been described. Through the use of CT, this investigation sought to precisely define volumes of mechanical tissue damage by anatomic region and examine its impact on organ failure.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients with MOF have a greater volume of pelvic and retroperitoneal tissue damage when compared with those without MOF? (2) In patients who sustained pelvic trauma, does the magnitude of pelvic injury differ in patients with MOF? (3) Does the magnitude of organ dysfunction correlate with pelvic tissue damage volume?
Seventy-four multiply injured patients aged 18 to 65 years with an ISS ≥ 18 admitted to the intensive care unit for a minimum of 6 days with complete admission CT scans were analyzed. Each identifiable injury in the head/neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis underwent volumetric determination using CT to generate regional tissue damage volume scores. Primary outcomes were the development of MOF as measured by the Denver MOF score and the degree of organ dysfunction by utilization of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Mean pelvic and retroperitoneal tissue damage volumes were compared in patients who developed MOF and those who did not develop MOF using Student's t-test. Among patients who sustained pelvic injuries, we compared mean volume of tissue damaged in patients who developed MOF and those who did not. We assessed whether there was a correlation between organ dysfunction, as measured by the SOFA score as a continuous variable, and the volume of pelvic and retroperitoneal tissue damage using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient.
The average volume of tissue damage was greater in patients with MOF when compared with those without (MOF: 685.667 ± 1081.344; non-MOF: 195.511 ± 381.436; mean difference 490.156 cc [95% confidence interval {CI}, 50.076-930.237 cc], p = 0.030). Among patients who sustained pelvic injuries, those with MOF had higher average tissue damage volumes than those without MOF (MOF: 1322.000 ± 1197.050; non-MOF: 382.750 ± 465.005; mean difference 939.250 [95% CI, 229.267-1649.233], p = 0.013). Organ dysfunction (SOFA score) correlated with higher volumes of pelvic tissue damage (r = 0.570, p < 0.001).
This investigation demonstrated that greater degrees of pelvic and retroperitoneal tissue damage calculated from injury CT scans in multiply injured patients is associated with more severe organ dysfunction and an increased risk of developing MOF. Early identification of polytrauma patients at risk of MOF allows clinicians to implement appropriate resuscitative strategies early in the disease course. Improved stratification of injury severity and a patient's anticipated clinical course may aid in the planning and execution of staged orthopaedic interventions. Future avenues of study should incorporate the ischemic/hypoperfusion component of pelvic injury in conjunction with the mechanical component presented here for improved stratification of multiply injured patients at higher risk of MOF.
Level III, prognostic study.
骨盆和腹膜后创伤是多发伤患者发病和死亡的主要原因。损伤严重度评分(ISS)因不能充分体现和准确界定机械性损伤而受到批评。骨盆损伤体积对器官功能障碍和多器官功能衰竭(MOF)的影响尚未见描述。本研究通过CT精确界定各解剖区域机械性组织损伤的体积,并探讨其对器官衰竭的影响。
问题/目的:(1)与未发生MOF的患者相比,发生MOF的患者骨盆和腹膜后组织损伤体积是否更大?(2)在发生骨盆创伤的患者中,发生MOF的患者与未发生MOF的患者相比,骨盆损伤程度是否不同?(3)器官功能障碍程度与骨盆组织损伤体积是否相关?
分析74例年龄在18至65岁、ISS≥18且入住重症监护病房至少6天并进行了完整入院CT扫描的多发伤患者。对头/颈、胸、腹和骨盆的每一处可识别损伤进行CT容积测定,以生成区域组织损伤体积评分。主要结局指标为用丹佛MOF评分衡量的MOF发生情况以及用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分衡量的器官功能障碍程度。采用Student t检验比较发生MOF的患者和未发生MOF的患者的平均骨盆和腹膜后组织损伤体积。在发生骨盆损伤的患者中,比较发生MOF的患者和未发生MOF的患者的平均组织损伤体积。我们用Pearson积差相关系数评估作为连续变量的SOFA评分所衡量的器官功能障碍与骨盆和腹膜后组织损伤体积之间是否存在相关性。
与未发生MOF的患者相比,发生MOF的患者平均组织损伤体积更大(MOF组:685.667±1081.344;未发生MOF组:195.511±381.436;平均差值490.156 cc[95%置信区间{CI},50.076 - 930.237 cc],p = 0.030)。在发生骨盆损伤的患者中,发生MOF的患者平均组织损伤体积高于未发生MOF的患者(MOF组:1322.000±1197.050;未发生MOF组:382.750±465.005;平均差值939.250[95% CI,229.267 - 1649.233],p = 0.013)。器官功能障碍(SOFA评分)与更高的骨盆组织损伤体积相关(r = 0.570,p < 0.001)。
本研究表明,多发伤患者损伤CT扫描计算得出的骨盆和腹膜后组织损伤程度越高,与更严重的器官功能障碍及发生MOF的风险增加相关。早期识别有MOF风险的多发伤患者可使临床医生在病程早期实施适当的复苏策略。改进损伤严重程度分层及患者预期临床病程评估可能有助于分期骨科干预的规划与实施。未来的研究方向应将骨盆损伤的缺血/低灌注因素与本文所述的机械因素相结合,以更好地对MOF高风险的多发伤患者进行分层。
III级,预后研究。