Suppr超能文献

就诊时合并右束支传导阻滞的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征、管理及预后

Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block on Presentation.

作者信息

Chan William K, Goodman Shaun G, Brieger David, Fox Keith A A, Gale Chris P, Chew Derek P, Udell Jacob A, Lopez-Sendon Jose, Huynh Thao, Yan Raymond T, Singh Sheldon M, Yan Andrew T

机构信息

Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, Department of Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, Department of Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Canadian Heart Research Centre, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;117(5):754-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 12.

Abstract

We examined the relations between right bundle branch block (RBBB) and clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes among a broad spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Admission electrocardiograms of patients enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) electrocardiogram substudy and the Canadian ACS Registry I were analyzed independently at a blinded core laboratory. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the independent prognostic significance of admission RBBB on in-hospital and 6-month mortality. Of 11,830 eligible patients with ACS (mean age 65; 66% non-ST-elevation ACS), 5% had RBBB. RBBB on admission was associated with older age, male sex, more cardiovascular risk factors, worse Killip class, and higher GRACE risk score (all p <0.01). Patients with RBBB less frequently received in-hospital cardiac catheterization, coronary revascularization, or reperfusion therapy (all p <0.05). The RBBB group had higher unadjusted in-hospital (8.8% vs 3.8%, p <0.001) and 6-month mortality rates (15.1% vs 7.6%, p <0.001). After adjusting for established prognostic factors in the GRACE risk score, RBBB was a significant independent predictor of in-hospital death (odds ratio 1.45, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.07, p = 0.039), but not cumulative 6-month mortality (odds ratio 1.29, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.74, p = 0.098). There was no significant interaction between RBBB and the type of ACS for either in-hospital or 6-month mortality (both p >0.50). In conclusion, across a spectrum of ACS, RBBB was associated with preexisting cardiovascular disease, high-risk clinical features, fewer cardiac interventions, and worse unadjusted outcomes. After adjusting for components of the GRACE risk score, RBBB was a significant independent predictor of early mortality.

摘要

我们研究了广泛的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)与临床特征、治疗及预后之间的关系。在一个盲法核心实验室对全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)心电图子研究和加拿大ACS注册研究I中登记患者的入院心电图进行了独立分析。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估入院时RBBB对住院期间及6个月死亡率的独立预后意义。在11830例符合条件的ACS患者(平均年龄65岁;66%为非ST段抬高型ACS)中,5%有RBBB。入院时RBBB与年龄较大、男性、更多心血管危险因素、更差的Killip分级及更高的GRACE风险评分相关(均p<0.01)。RBBB患者较少接受住院心脏导管插入术、冠状动脉血运重建或再灌注治疗(均p<0.05)。RBBB组未经调整的住院死亡率(8.8%对3.8%,p<0.001)和6个月死亡率(15.1%对7.6%,p<0.001)更高。在对GRACE风险评分中的既定预后因素进行调整后,RBBB是住院死亡的显著独立预测因素(比值比1.45,95%CI 1.02至2.07,p=0.039),但不是6个月累积死亡率的预测因素(比值比1.29,95%CI 0.95至1.74,p=0.098)。对于住院或6个月死亡率,RBBB与ACS类型之间均无显著交互作用(均p>0.50)。总之,在一系列ACS患者中,RBBB与既往存在的心血管疾病、高危临床特征、较少的心脏干预措施及更差的未经调整的预后相关。在对GRACE风险评分的组成部分进行调整后,RBBB是早期死亡率的显著独立预测因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验