Chan William K, Goodman Shaun G, Brieger David, Fox Keith A A, Gale Chris P, Chew Derek P, Udell Jacob A, Lopez-Sendon Jose, Huynh Thao, Yan Raymond T, Singh Sheldon M, Yan Andrew T
Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, Department of Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, Department of Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Canadian Heart Research Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;117(5):754-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
We examined the relations between right bundle branch block (RBBB) and clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes among a broad spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Admission electrocardiograms of patients enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) electrocardiogram substudy and the Canadian ACS Registry I were analyzed independently at a blinded core laboratory. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the independent prognostic significance of admission RBBB on in-hospital and 6-month mortality. Of 11,830 eligible patients with ACS (mean age 65; 66% non-ST-elevation ACS), 5% had RBBB. RBBB on admission was associated with older age, male sex, more cardiovascular risk factors, worse Killip class, and higher GRACE risk score (all p <0.01). Patients with RBBB less frequently received in-hospital cardiac catheterization, coronary revascularization, or reperfusion therapy (all p <0.05). The RBBB group had higher unadjusted in-hospital (8.8% vs 3.8%, p <0.001) and 6-month mortality rates (15.1% vs 7.6%, p <0.001). After adjusting for established prognostic factors in the GRACE risk score, RBBB was a significant independent predictor of in-hospital death (odds ratio 1.45, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.07, p = 0.039), but not cumulative 6-month mortality (odds ratio 1.29, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.74, p = 0.098). There was no significant interaction between RBBB and the type of ACS for either in-hospital or 6-month mortality (both p >0.50). In conclusion, across a spectrum of ACS, RBBB was associated with preexisting cardiovascular disease, high-risk clinical features, fewer cardiac interventions, and worse unadjusted outcomes. After adjusting for components of the GRACE risk score, RBBB was a significant independent predictor of early mortality.
我们研究了广泛的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)与临床特征、治疗及预后之间的关系。在一个盲法核心实验室对全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)心电图子研究和加拿大ACS注册研究I中登记患者的入院心电图进行了独立分析。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估入院时RBBB对住院期间及6个月死亡率的独立预后意义。在11830例符合条件的ACS患者(平均年龄65岁;66%为非ST段抬高型ACS)中,5%有RBBB。入院时RBBB与年龄较大、男性、更多心血管危险因素、更差的Killip分级及更高的GRACE风险评分相关(均p<0.01)。RBBB患者较少接受住院心脏导管插入术、冠状动脉血运重建或再灌注治疗(均p<0.05)。RBBB组未经调整的住院死亡率(8.8%对3.8%,p<0.001)和6个月死亡率(15.1%对7.6%,p<0.001)更高。在对GRACE风险评分中的既定预后因素进行调整后,RBBB是住院死亡的显著独立预测因素(比值比1.45,95%CI 1.02至2.07,p=0.039),但不是6个月累积死亡率的预测因素(比值比1.29,95%CI 0.95至1.74,p=0.098)。对于住院或6个月死亡率,RBBB与ACS类型之间均无显著交互作用(均p>0.50)。总之,在一系列ACS患者中,RBBB与既往存在的心血管疾病、高危临床特征、较少的心脏干预措施及更差的未经调整的预后相关。在对GRACE风险评分的组成部分进行调整后,RBBB是早期死亡率的显著独立预测因素。