• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左前分支阻滞的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征和结局。

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients with left anterior hemiblock.

机构信息

St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Canadian Heart Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Heart. 2014 Sep 15;100(18):1456-61. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305708. Epub 2014 May 19.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305708
PMID:24842872
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to study the relationships between left anterior hemiblock (LAHB) and the patient characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

METHODS

Admission ECGs of patients enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) ECG substudy, and the Canadian ACS Registry I, were analysed independently at a blinded core laboratory. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the independent associations between LAHB on the admission ECG and in-hospital and 6-month mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 11 820 eligible ACS patients, 692 (5.9%) patients had LAHB. The presence of LAHB on admission was associated with older age, male sex, prior myocardial infarction, prior heart failure, worse Killip class, higher creatinine level, and higher GRACE risk score (all p<0.01). Patients with LAHB less frequently underwent cardiac catheterisation, coronary revascularisation or reperfusion therapy (all p<0.05). The LAHB group had higher in-hospital (6.9% vs 3.9%, p<0.001) and 6-month mortality (12.5% vs 7.7%, p<0.001). However, after adjusting for the known predictors of mortality in the GRACE risk models, LAHB was not independently associated with in-hospital death (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.52, p=0.70), or death at 6 months (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.34, p=0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Across the broad spectrum of ACS, LAHB was associated with significant comorbidities, high-risk clinical features on presentation, and worse unadjusted outcomes. However, LAHB was not an independent predictor of in-hospital and 6-month mortality and did not carry incremental prognostic value beyond the known prognosticators in the GRACE risk models.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者左前分支阻滞(LAHB)与患者特征、处理方法和临床结局之间的关系。

方法

在全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)心电图子研究和加拿大 ACS 登记 I 中,对入选患者的入院心电图进行独立分析,并在一个盲法核心实验室进行分析。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估入院心电图上 LAHB 与住院期间和 6 个月死亡率之间的独立相关性。

结果

在 11820 例符合条件的 ACS 患者中,有 692(5.9%)例患者存在 LAHB。入院时存在 LAHB 与年龄较大、男性、既往心肌梗死、既往心力衰竭、较高的 Killip 分级、较高的肌酐水平和较高的 GRACE 风险评分相关(均 p<0.01)。LAHB 患者较少接受心脏导管检查、冠状动脉血运重建或再灌注治疗(均 p<0.05)。LAHB 组住院期间(6.9% vs 3.9%,p<0.001)和 6 个月死亡率(12.5% vs 7.7%,p<0.001)较高。然而,在校正 GRACE 风险模型中已知的死亡率预测因素后,LAHB 与住院期间死亡(OR 1.07,95%CI 0.76 至 1.52,p=0.70)或 6 个月死亡(OR 1.00,95%CI 0.75 至 1.34,p=0.99)无关。

结论

在 ACS 的广泛范围内,LAHB 与明显的合并症、就诊时的高危临床特征以及较差的未经调整结局相关。然而,LAHB 不是住院期间和 6 个月死亡率的独立预测因子,并且在 GRACE 风险模型中的已知预后因素之外,LAHB 没有额外的预后价值。

相似文献

1
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients with left anterior hemiblock.左前分支阻滞的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征和结局。
Heart. 2014 Sep 15;100(18):1456-61. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305708. Epub 2014 May 19.
2
Treatment and outcomes of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes in relation to initial diagnostic impressions (insights from the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE] and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events [CANRACE]).疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者的治疗和转归与初始诊断印象的关系(来自加拿大急性冠状动脉事件全球登记处[GRACE]和加拿大急性冠状动脉事件登记处[CANRACE]的见解)。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 15;111(2):202-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.018. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
3
ST-segment depression in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: quantitative analysis may not provide incremental prognostic value beyond comprehensive risk stratification.非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征中的ST段压低:定量分析可能不会在全面风险分层之外提供额外的预后价值。
Am Heart J. 2006 Aug;152(2):270-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.12.003.
4
Temporal changes in the management and outcome of Canadian diabetic patients hospitalized for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.加拿大非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征住院患者的管理和结局的时间变化。
Am Heart J. 2011 Aug;162(2):347-355.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.020. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
5
Disparities in management patterns and outcomes of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome with and without a history of cerebrovascular disease.非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者伴或不伴脑血管病史的管理模式和结局的差异。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 15;105(8):1083-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.005. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
6
Comparison of acute coronary syndrome in patients receiving versus not receiving chronic dialysis (from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE] Registry).比较接受与未接受慢性透析治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者(来自全球急性冠状动脉事件登记处[GRACE]登记处)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jan 1;109(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.062. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
7
Prognostic implications of prominent R wave in electrocardiographic leads V1 or V2 in patients with acute coronary syndrome.心电图 V1 或 V2 导联 R 波高耸对急性冠状动脉综合征患者预后的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jun 15;113(12):1962-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.035. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
8
Prognostic value of dynamic electrocardiographic T wave changes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.动态心电图T波改变在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中的预后价值
Heart. 2016 Sep 1;102(17):1396-402. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309161. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
9
Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block on Presentation.就诊时合并右束支传导阻滞的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征、管理及预后
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;117(5):754-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
10
Prognostic significance of low QRS voltage on the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者入院心电图低QRS电压的预后意义
Int J Cardiol. 2015;190:34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.085. Epub 2015 Apr 14.