Suppr超能文献

头痛疾病的实验室检查——新时代的曙光?

Laboratory tests of headache disorders - dawn of a new era?

作者信息

Schytz Henrik Winther, Olesen Jes

机构信息

University of Copenhagen, Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology at Glostrup Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2016 Nov;36(13):1268-1290. doi: 10.1177/0333102415612585. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

Abstract

Context The classification of headache disorders has improved over the years, but further work is needed to develop and improve headache diagnosis within headache subtypes. The present review is a call for action to implement laboratory tests in the classification and management of primary and some secondary headaches. Background In this narrative review we present and discuss published tests that might be useful in phenotyping and/or diagnosis of long-lasting headache disorders such as migraine, tension-type headache, trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, trigeminal neuralgia and persisting secondary headaches. Aim The palpometer test, quantitative sensory testing, nociceptive blink reflex and autonomic tests may be valuable to phenotype and/or diagnose subforms of migraine, tension-type headache, cluster headache, trigeminal neuralgia and medication-overuse headache. Provocation tests with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) may be valuable in subclassification of migraine and cluster headache. Lumbar pressure monitoring and optical coherence tomography may valuable tools to diagnose and follow patients with chronic headache and raised intracranial pressure. Finding A number of laboratory tests in headache research are presently available, but have primarily been performed in single research studies or a few studies that differ in methods and patient groups. At present, there is no evidence-based strategy for implementing diagnostic tests, but this could be achieved if well-reputed tertiary headache centers commence developing and implementing laboratory tests in order to improve the classification and treatment of headache patients.

摘要

背景 多年来头痛疾病的分类已有改进,但在头痛亚型中开展和改进头痛诊断仍需进一步努力。本综述呼吁采取行动,在原发性和一些继发性头痛的分类及管理中应用实验室检查。

背景 在本叙述性综述中,我们展示并讨论已发表的可能有助于对偏头痛、紧张型头痛、三叉自主神经性头痛、三叉神经痛和持续性继发性头痛等持续性头痛疾病进行表型分析和/或诊断的检查。

目的 触诊计检查、定量感觉测试、伤害性眨眼反射和自主神经测试可能对偏头痛、紧张型头痛、丛集性头痛、三叉神经痛和药物过量使用性头痛的亚型进行表型分析和/或诊断有价值。硝酸甘油(GTN)和降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)激发试验可能对偏头痛和丛集性头痛的亚分类有价值。腰椎压力监测和光学相干断层扫描可能是诊断和随访慢性头痛及颅内压升高患者的有价值工具。

发现 目前在头痛研究中有一些实验室检查可用,但主要是在单一研究或少数方法和患者群体不同的研究中进行的。目前,没有基于证据的实施诊断性检查的策略,但如果声誉良好的三级头痛中心开始开展和实施实验室检查,以改善头痛患者的分类和治疗,这一点是可以实现 的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验