Johnson Tiffani J, Hickey Robert W, Switzer Galen E, Miller Elizabeth, Winger Daniel G, Nguyen Margaret, Saladino Richard A, Hausmann Leslie R M
Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, PolicyLab, and Center for Perinatal and Pediatric Health Disparities Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):297-305. doi: 10.1111/acem.12901. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
The emergency department (ED) is characterized by stressors (e.g., fatigue, stress, time pressure, and complex decision-making) that can pose challenges to delivering high-quality, equitable care. Although it has been suggested that characteristics of the ED may exacerbate reliance on cognitive heuristics, no research has directly investigated whether stressors in the ED impact physician racial bias, a common heuristic. We seek to determine if physicians have different levels of implicit racial bias post-ED shift versus preshift and to examine associations between demographics and cognitive stressors with bias.
This repeated-measures study of resident physicians in a pediatric ED used electronic pre- and postshift assessments of implicit racial bias, demographics, and cognitive stressors. Implicit bias was measured using the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT). Linear regression models compared differences in IAT scores pre- to postshift and determined associations between participant demographics and cognitive stressors with postshift IAT and pre- to postshift difference scores.
Participants (n = 91) displayed moderate prowhite/antiblack bias on preshift (mean ± SD = 0.50 ± 0.34, d = 1.48) and postshift (mean ± SD = 0.55 ± 0.39, d = 1.40) IAT scores. Overall, IAT scores did not differ preshift to postshift (mean increase = 0.05, 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.14, d = 0.13). Subanalyses revealed increased pre- to postshift bias among participants working when the ED was more overcrowded (mean increase = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.17, d = 0.24) and among those caring for >10 patients (mean increase = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.27, d = 0.47). Residents' demographics (including specialty), fatigue, busyness, stressfulness, and number of shifts were not associated with postshift IAT or difference scores. In multivariable models, ED overcrowding was associated with greater postshift bias (coefficient = 0.11 per 1 unit of NEDOCS score, SE = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.21).
While resident implicit bias remained stable overall preshift to postshift, cognitive stressors (overcrowding and patient load) were associated with increased implicit bias. Physicians in the ED should be aware of how cognitive stressors may exacerbate implicit racial bias.
急诊科存在多种压力源(如疲劳、压力、时间紧迫和复杂的决策),这些压力源可能对提供高质量、公平的医疗服务构成挑战。尽管有人认为急诊科的特点可能会加剧对认知启发法的依赖,但尚无研究直接调查急诊科的压力源是否会影响医生的种族偏见(一种常见的启发法)。我们试图确定医生在急诊科轮班后与轮班前的内隐种族偏见水平是否不同,并研究人口统计学特征和认知压力源与偏见之间的关联。
这项针对儿科急诊科住院医师的重复测量研究,使用了电子方式在轮班前和轮班后对内隐种族偏见、人口统计学特征和认知压力源进行评估。内隐偏见通过种族内隐联想测验(IAT)进行测量。线性回归模型比较了轮班前和轮班后IAT分数的差异,并确定了参与者人口统计学特征和认知压力源与轮班后IAT分数以及轮班前和轮班后差异分数之间的关联。
参与者(n = 91)在轮班前(均值±标准差 = 0.50 ± 0.34,d = 1.48)和轮班后(均值±标准差 = 0.55 ± 0.39,d = 1.40)的IAT分数显示出中等程度的亲白人/反黑人偏见。总体而言,轮班前到轮班后的IAT分数没有差异(平均增加 = 0.05,95%置信区间 = -0.02至0.14,d = 0.13)。亚组分析显示,在急诊科更拥挤时工作的参与者中,轮班前到轮班后的偏见增加(平均增加 = 0.09,95%置信区间 = 0.01至0.17,d = 0.24),以及在照顾超过10名患者的参与者中(平均增加 = 0.17,95%置信区间 = 0.05至0.27,d = 0.47)。住院医师的人口统计学特征(包括专业)、疲劳、忙碌程度、压力水平和轮班次数与轮班后IAT分数或差异分数无关。在多变量模型中,急诊科拥挤程度与轮班后更大的偏见相关(每增加1个NEDOCS分数单位,系数 = 0.11,标准误 = 0.05,95%置信区间 = 0.00至0.21)。
虽然住院医师的内隐偏见在轮班前到轮班后总体上保持稳定,但认知压力源(拥挤和患者负荷)与内隐偏见增加有关。急诊科医生应意识到认知压力源可能如何加剧内隐种族偏见。