Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242181. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2181.
Racial implicit bias can contribute to health disparities through its negative influence on physician communication with Black patients. Interventions for physicians to address racial implicit bias in their clinical encounters are limited by a lack of high-fidelity (realistic) simulations to provide opportunities for skill development and practice.
To describe the development and initial evaluation of a high-fidelity simulation of conditions under which physicians might be influenced by implicit racial bias.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study, performed on an online platform from March 1 to September 30, 2022, recruited a convenience sample of physician volunteers to pilot an educational simulation.
In the simulation exercise, physicians saw a 52-year-old male standardized patient (SP) (presenting as Black or White) seeking urgent care for epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. The case included cognitive stressors common to clinical environments, including clinical ambiguity, stress, time constraints, and interruptions. Physicians explained their diagnosis and treatment plan to the SP, wrote an assessment and management plan, completed surveys, and took the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT) and Race Medical Cooperativeness IAT. The SPs, blinded to the purpose of the study, assessed each physician's communication using skills checklists and global rating scales.
Association between physicians' IAT scores and SP race with SP ratings of communication skills.
In 60 physicians (23 [38.3%] Asian, 4 [6.7%] Black, 23 [38.3%] White, and 10 [16.7%] other, including Latina/o/x, Middle Eastern, and multiracial; 31 [51.7%] female, 27 [45.0%] male, and 2 [3.3%] other), the interaction of physicians' Race IAT score and SP race was significant for overall communication (mean [SD] β = -1.29 [0.41]), all subdomains of communication (mean [SD] β = -1.17 [0.52] to -1.43 [0.59]), and overall global ratings (mean [SD] β = -1.09 [0.39]). Black SPs rated physicians lower on communication skills for a given pro-White Race IAT score than White SPs; White SP ratings increased as physicians' pro-White bias increased.
In this cross-sectional study, a high-fidelity simulation calibrated with cognitive stressors common to clinical environments elicited the expected influence of racial implicit bias on physicians' communication skills. The outlined process and preliminary results can inform the development and evaluation of interventions that seek to address racial implicit bias in clinical encounters and improve physician communication with Black patients.
种族内隐偏见会通过对医生与黑人患者沟通的负面影响导致健康差距。由于缺乏高保真(现实)模拟来提供技能发展和实践的机会,医生针对临床接触中存在的种族内隐偏见采取干预措施的情况受到限制。
描述一种高保真模拟的开发和初步评估,这种模拟可以模拟医生可能受到内隐种族偏见影响的条件。
设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究于 2022 年 3 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日在一个在线平台上进行,招募了方便样本的医生志愿者来试点教育模拟。
在模拟练习中,医生看到一位 52 岁的男性标准化患者(SP)(呈现为黑人或白人)因上腹痛、恶心和呕吐寻求紧急护理。该病例包括临床环境中常见的认知压力源,包括临床模糊性、压力、时间限制和中断。医生向 SP 解释他们的诊断和治疗计划,撰写评估和管理计划,完成调查,并参加种族内隐联想测试(IAT)和种族医疗合作性 IAT。SP 对研究目的不知情,使用技能检查表和总体评分量表评估每位医生的沟通情况。
医生的 IAT 分数与 SP 种族与 SP 对沟通技巧的评分之间的关联。
在 60 名医生中(23 名[38.3%]为亚洲人,4 名[6.7%]为黑人,23 名[38.3%]为白人,10 名[16.7%]为其他种族,包括拉丁裔/美洲原住民/西班牙裔、中东人和多种族;31 名[51.7%]为女性,27 名[45.0%]为男性,2 名[3.3%]为其他性别),医生的种族 IAT 分数和 SP 种族之间的交互作用对整体沟通(平均[SD]β=-1.29[0.41])、沟通的所有子领域(平均[SD]β=-1.17[0.52]至-1.43[0.59])和整体总体评分(平均[SD]β=-1.09[0.39])均有显著影响。对于给定的亲白种族 IAT 分数,黑人 SP 对医生的沟通技巧评分低于白人 SP;随着医生亲白偏见的增加,白人 SP 的评分会增加。
在这项横断面研究中,一种与临床环境中常见的认知压力源相匹配的高保真模拟引发了种族内隐偏见对医生沟通技巧的预期影响。所概述的过程和初步结果可以为旨在解决临床接触中种族内隐偏见并改善医生与黑人患者沟通的干预措施的开发和评估提供信息。