Suppr超能文献

医生在模拟环境中的种族内隐偏见与沟通

Racial Implicit Bias and Communication Among Physicians in a Simulated Environment.

机构信息

Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York.

Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242181. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2181.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Racial implicit bias can contribute to health disparities through its negative influence on physician communication with Black patients. Interventions for physicians to address racial implicit bias in their clinical encounters are limited by a lack of high-fidelity (realistic) simulations to provide opportunities for skill development and practice.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development and initial evaluation of a high-fidelity simulation of conditions under which physicians might be influenced by implicit racial bias.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study, performed on an online platform from March 1 to September 30, 2022, recruited a convenience sample of physician volunteers to pilot an educational simulation.

EXPOSURES

In the simulation exercise, physicians saw a 52-year-old male standardized patient (SP) (presenting as Black or White) seeking urgent care for epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. The case included cognitive stressors common to clinical environments, including clinical ambiguity, stress, time constraints, and interruptions. Physicians explained their diagnosis and treatment plan to the SP, wrote an assessment and management plan, completed surveys, and took the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT) and Race Medical Cooperativeness IAT. The SPs, blinded to the purpose of the study, assessed each physician's communication using skills checklists and global rating scales.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Association between physicians' IAT scores and SP race with SP ratings of communication skills.

RESULTS

In 60 physicians (23 [38.3%] Asian, 4 [6.7%] Black, 23 [38.3%] White, and 10 [16.7%] other, including Latina/o/x, Middle Eastern, and multiracial; 31 [51.7%] female, 27 [45.0%] male, and 2 [3.3%] other), the interaction of physicians' Race IAT score and SP race was significant for overall communication (mean [SD] β = -1.29 [0.41]), all subdomains of communication (mean [SD] β = -1.17 [0.52] to -1.43 [0.59]), and overall global ratings (mean [SD] β = -1.09 [0.39]). Black SPs rated physicians lower on communication skills for a given pro-White Race IAT score than White SPs; White SP ratings increased as physicians' pro-White bias increased.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, a high-fidelity simulation calibrated with cognitive stressors common to clinical environments elicited the expected influence of racial implicit bias on physicians' communication skills. The outlined process and preliminary results can inform the development and evaluation of interventions that seek to address racial implicit bias in clinical encounters and improve physician communication with Black patients.

摘要

重要性

种族内隐偏见会通过对医生与黑人患者沟通的负面影响导致健康差距。由于缺乏高保真(现实)模拟来提供技能发展和实践的机会,医生针对临床接触中存在的种族内隐偏见采取干预措施的情况受到限制。

目的

描述一种高保真模拟的开发和初步评估,这种模拟可以模拟医生可能受到内隐种族偏见影响的条件。

设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究于 2022 年 3 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日在一个在线平台上进行,招募了方便样本的医生志愿者来试点教育模拟。

暴露因素

在模拟练习中,医生看到一位 52 岁的男性标准化患者(SP)(呈现为黑人或白人)因上腹痛、恶心和呕吐寻求紧急护理。该病例包括临床环境中常见的认知压力源,包括临床模糊性、压力、时间限制和中断。医生向 SP 解释他们的诊断和治疗计划,撰写评估和管理计划,完成调查,并参加种族内隐联想测试(IAT)和种族医疗合作性 IAT。SP 对研究目的不知情,使用技能检查表和总体评分量表评估每位医生的沟通情况。

主要结果和措施

医生的 IAT 分数与 SP 种族与 SP 对沟通技巧的评分之间的关联。

结果

在 60 名医生中(23 名[38.3%]为亚洲人,4 名[6.7%]为黑人,23 名[38.3%]为白人,10 名[16.7%]为其他种族,包括拉丁裔/美洲原住民/西班牙裔、中东人和多种族;31 名[51.7%]为女性,27 名[45.0%]为男性,2 名[3.3%]为其他性别),医生的种族 IAT 分数和 SP 种族之间的交互作用对整体沟通(平均[SD]β=-1.29[0.41])、沟通的所有子领域(平均[SD]β=-1.17[0.52]至-1.43[0.59])和整体总体评分(平均[SD]β=-1.09[0.39])均有显著影响。对于给定的亲白种族 IAT 分数,黑人 SP 对医生的沟通技巧评分低于白人 SP;随着医生亲白偏见的增加,白人 SP 的评分会增加。

结论和相关性

在这项横断面研究中,一种与临床环境中常见的认知压力源相匹配的高保真模拟引发了种族内隐偏见对医生沟通技巧的预期影响。所概述的过程和初步结果可以为旨在解决临床接触中种族内隐偏见并改善医生与黑人患者沟通的干预措施的开发和评估提供信息。

相似文献

1
Racial Implicit Bias and Communication Among Physicians in a Simulated Environment.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242181. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2181.
2
Is physician implicit bias associated with differences in care by patient race for metastatic cancer-related pain?
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 27;16(10):e0257794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257794. eCollection 2021.
3
Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Sep;22(9):1231-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0258-5. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
4
Association of Racial Bias With Burnout Among Resident Physicians.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197457. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7457.
5
Comparison of Physician Implicit Racial Bias Toward Adults Versus Children.
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Mar;17(2):120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
6
Do physicians' implicit views of African Americans affect clinical decision making?
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;27(2):177-88. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.120314.
7
The Impact of Cognitive Stressors in the Emergency Department on Physician Implicit Racial Bias.
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):297-305. doi: 10.1111/acem.12901. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
8
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
9
10
Genetic counselors' implicit racial attitudes and their relationship to communication.
Health Psychol. 2015 Feb;34(2):111-9. doi: 10.1037/hea0000155.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Simulation-Based Learning with Standardized Patients (SP) in an Implicit Bias Mitigation Clinician Training Program.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2023 Jun 5;10:23821205231175033. doi: 10.1177/23821205231175033. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Seeking Racial Equity in Hematology and Oncology: a Fellow-Led Educational Series to Promote Reflection and Action.
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1241-1244. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02255-8. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
Implicit bias instruction across disciplines related to the social determinants of health: a scoping review.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 May;28(2):541-587. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10168-w. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
5
Tackling Implicit Bias in Health Care.
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 14;387(2):105-107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2201180. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
6
Realizing Inclusion and Systemic Equity in Medicine: Upstanding in the Medical Workplace (RISE UP)-an Antibias Curriculum.
MedEdPORTAL. 2022 Apr 6;18:11233. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11233. eCollection 2022.
7
Brief online implicit bias education increases bias awareness among clinical teaching faculty.
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2025307. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2025307.
8
Longitudinal outcomes one year following implicit bias training in medical students.
Med Teach. 2022 Jul;44(7):744-751. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.2023120. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
9
Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test.
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Jun;54(3):1161-1180. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
10
Addressing Implicit Bias in First-Year Medical Students: a Longitudinal, Multidisciplinary Training Program.
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Aug 14;30(4):1419-1426. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01047-3. eCollection 2020 Dec.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验