• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Palatal lesions: discriminative value of conventional MRI and diffusion weighted imaging.腭部病变:传统MRI与弥散加权成像的鉴别价值
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1059):20150911. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150911. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
2
Parotid gland lesions: separate and combined diagnostic value of conventional MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.腮腺病变:常规MRI、扩散加权成像及动态对比增强MRI的单独及联合诊断价值
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1060):20150912. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150912. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
3
Benign and malignant skull-involved lesions: discriminative value of conventional CT and MRI combined with diffusion-weighted MRI.累及颅骨的良性与恶性病变:传统CT、MRI及扩散加权MRI的鉴别价值
Acta Radiol. 2019 Jul;60(7):880-886. doi: 10.1177/0284185118773541. Epub 2018 May 9.
4
Utility of apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis in differentiating benign and malignant palate lesions.表观扩散系数直方图分析在鉴别腭部良恶性病变中的应用。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Dec;157:110566. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110566. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
5
Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.扩散加权成像和扩散张量成像中扩散参数对乳腺病变诊断性能的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
6
Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative diffusion-weighted sequence on 3 T MRI.使用 3T MRI 上的定量扩散加权序列对乳腺良恶性病变进行鉴别。
Clin Radiol. 2014 Jan;69(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
7
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.体素内不相干运动(IVIM)在评估乳腺病变中的应用:与常规 DWI 的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e782-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
8
Significance of the ADC ratio in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.表观扩散系数(ADC)比值在乳腺病变鉴别诊断中的意义
Acta Radiol. 2016 Apr;57(4):422-9. doi: 10.1177/0284185115590286. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
9
Role of diffusion-weighted MRI: predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.扩散加权磁共振成像的作用:预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移
Acta Radiol. 2014 Oct;55(8):909-16. doi: 10.1177/0284185113509094. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
10
Optimal b value in diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiation of abdominal lesions.扩散加权成像中用于腹部病变鉴别的最佳b值
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;40(3):559-66. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24403. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Testicular tumors: discriminative value of conventional MRI and diffusion weighted imaging.睾丸肿瘤:常规 MRI 和弥散加权成像的鉴别价值。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 3;100(48):e27799. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027799.
2
Strain elastography of palatal tumors in conjunction with intraoral ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: 2 case reports.腭部肿瘤的应变弹性成像联合口腔内超声、计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像:2例报告
Imaging Sci Dent. 2020 Mar;50(1):73-79. doi: 10.5624/isd.2020.50.1.73. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
3
Differential diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in non-cystic lesions in floor of the mouth.弥散加权和动态对比增强磁共振成像在口腔底部非囊性病变中的鉴别诊断价值。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Mar;48(3):20180240. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180240. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
4
Diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation between sialadenitis and pleomorphic adenoma.扩散加权磁共振成像用于鉴别涎腺炎和多形性腺瘤。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Jan;46(1):20160257. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160257. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Diffusion-weighted imaging in the head and neck region: usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for characterization of lesions.头颈部区域的扩散加权成像:表观扩散系数值在病变特征描述中的应用价值
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):208-14. doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.14279.
2
Differentiation of benign and malignant lesions of the tongue by using diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T.使用3.0 T磁共振扩散加权成像鉴别舌部良恶性病变
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(7):20140325. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140325. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
3
The role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis, lymph node staging and assessment of treatment response of head and neck cancer.扩散加权磁共振成像在头颈部癌的诊断、淋巴结分期及治疗反应评估中的作用。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jan;44(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
4
Lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland: morphologic patterns and imaging features on CT and MRI.涎腺淋巴上皮癌:CT和MRI的形态学表现及影像特征
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Sep;35(9):1813-9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3940. Epub 2014 May 15.
5
CT and MR imaging findings of palatal tumors.硬腭肿瘤的 CT 和 MRI 影像学表现。
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Mar;83(3):e137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.11.028. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
6
Functional imaging for radiation treatment planning, response assessment, and adaptive therapy in head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症放射治疗计划、反应评估和自适应治疗的功能成像。
Radiographics. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(7):1909-29. doi: 10.1148/rg.337125163.
7
Neoplasms of the hard palate.硬腭肿瘤。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Mar;72(3):619-26. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
8
Predictive and prognostic role of functional imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.头颈部鳞状细胞癌功能成像的预测和预后作用。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jul;22(3):220-32. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2012.03.007.
9
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck.头部和颈部的弥散加权磁共振成像。
Radiology. 2012 Apr;263(1):19-32. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101821.
10
Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.表观扩散系数值及弥散加权磁共振成像在甲状腺良恶性结节鉴别诊断中的作用。
Clin Imaging. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.04.001.

腭部病变:传统MRI与弥散加权成像的鉴别价值

Palatal lesions: discriminative value of conventional MRI and diffusion weighted imaging.

作者信息

Yuan Ying, Tang Weiqing, Jiang Mengda, Tao Xiaofeng

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1059):20150911. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150911. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1259/bjr.20150911
PMID:26764280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4986503/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the ability of conventional MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and a combination of both MRI techniques to differentiate malignant and benign palatal lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective review of MRI findings was performed in patients with pathologically confirmed palatal lesions between January 2012 and December 2014. Each lesion was evaluated with conventional MRI characteristics, including enhancement, inner texture, margin, adjacent soft-tissue involvement and cervical lymph node, and/or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the differential performance of each parameter separately and together.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients (24 males, 18 females; age: 54.9 ± 16.4 years) were investigated. The optimal cut-off ADC value to distinguish malignant from benign lesions was 1.02 × 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1), with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 75.0%. Conventional MRI showed a sensitivity of 87.1% and a specificity of 63.6%. Combination of conventional MRI and ADC scores increased sensitivity to 100% and specificity to 75.0%. The AUCs did not differ significantly between conventional MRI alone, DWI alone and integration of both.

CONCLUSION

Additional DWI does not substantially improve differential ability of conventional MRI. However, combining ADC values with conventional MRI improves both sensitivity and specificity, which is of worth to be further validated in prospective studies with larger sample sizes.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Combination of conventional MRI and ADC scores could increase the ability to differentiate malignant from benign palatal lesions, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 75.0%, although without statistical significance.

摘要

目的

评估并比较传统磁共振成像(MRI)、扩散加权成像(DWI)以及这两种MRI技术联合使用鉴别腭部良恶性病变的能力。

方法

对2012年1月至2014年12月间经病理证实腭部病变患者的MRI检查结果进行回顾性分析。对每个病变进行传统MRI特征评估,包括强化、内部纹理、边缘、邻近软组织受累及颈部淋巴结情况,和/或表观扩散系数(ADC)值。进行统计学分析以分别及联合评估各参数的鉴别性能。

结果

共纳入42例患者(男性24例,女性18例;年龄:54.9±16.4岁)。鉴别良恶性病变的最佳ADC值截断点为1.02×10⁻³mm²/s,灵敏度为87.5%,特异度为75.0%。传统MRI的灵敏度为87.1%,特异度为63.6%。传统MRI与ADC评分联合使用可使灵敏度提高至100%,特异度提高至75.0%。单独使用传统MRI、单独使用DWI以及两者联合使用的曲线下面积(AUC)差异无统计学意义。

结论

额外的DWI并未显著提高传统MRI的鉴别能力。然而,将ADC值与传统MRI相结合可提高灵敏度和特异度,这值得在更大样本量的前瞻性研究中进一步验证。

知识进展

传统MRI与ADC评分联合使用可提高鉴别腭部良恶性病变的能力,灵敏度为100%,特异度为75.0%,尽管无统计学意义。