Suppr超能文献

两种用于神经放射学的镇静技术的比较。

A comparison of two sedation techniques for neuroradiology.

作者信息

Allan M W, Laurence A S, Gunawardena W J

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1989 Sep;6(5):379-84.

PMID:2676530
Abstract

Two groups of 25 patients were sedated during neuroradiological investigation. The first group was sedated with fentanyl and midazolam while the other was given fentanyl and a two-stage infusion of propofol in a subanaesthetic dose. Both techniques resulted in satisfactory sedation and recovery, although those who received propofol were more likely to recall their journey from the X-ray department back to the ward. Sedation in both groups resulted in unacceptable PaO2 values in some patients which could subsequently be corrected by administration of supplementary oxygen.

摘要

两组各25名患者在神经放射学检查期间接受了镇静。第一组使用芬太尼和咪达唑仑进行镇静,而另一组则给予芬太尼和亚麻醉剂量的丙泊酚两阶段输注。两种技术均产生了令人满意的镇静和恢复效果,尽管接受丙泊酚的患者更有可能回忆起从X光科室返回病房的过程。两组的镇静在一些患者中导致了不可接受的动脉血氧分压(PaO2)值,随后可通过补充氧气予以纠正。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验