• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用ADAPT曲线表征风险预测模型的决策分析性能

Characterizing Decision-Analysis Performances of Risk Prediction Models Using ADAPT Curves.

作者信息

Lee Wen-Chung, Wu Yun-Chun

机构信息

From the Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (W-CL, Y-CW), and Research Center for Genes, Environment and Human Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan (W-CL).

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(2):e2477. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002477.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000002477
PMID:26765451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4718277/
Abstract

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve is a widely used index to characterize the performance of diagnostic tests and prediction models. However, the index does not explicitly acknowledge the utilities of risk predictions. Moreover, for most clinical settings, what counts is whether a prediction model can guide therapeutic decisions in a way that improves patient outcomes, rather than to simply update probabilities.Based on decision theory, the authors propose an alternative index, the "average deviation about the probability threshold" (ADAPT).An ADAPT curve (a plot of ADAPT value against the probability threshold) neatly characterizes the decision-analysis performances of a risk prediction model.Several prediction models can be compared for their ADAPT values at a chosen probability threshold, for a range of plausible threshold values, or for the whole ADAPT curves. This should greatly facilitate the selection of diagnostic tests and prediction models.

摘要

受试者工作特征曲线下面积是一种广泛用于表征诊断测试和预测模型性能的指标。然而,该指标并未明确考虑风险预测的效用。此外,对于大多数临床情况而言,重要的是预测模型能否以改善患者预后的方式指导治疗决策,而不仅仅是更新概率。基于决策理论,作者提出了一种替代指标,即“概率阈值平均偏差”(ADAPT)。ADAPT曲线(ADAPT值与概率阈值的关系图)可以清晰地表征风险预测模型的决策分析性能。可以在选定的概率阈值、一系列合理的阈值范围内或整个ADAPT曲线上比较几个预测模型的ADAPT值。这将极大地促进诊断测试和预测模型的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780d/4718277/8bb8fd55557a/medi-95-e2477-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780d/4718277/efaa5e200418/medi-95-e2477-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780d/4718277/8bb8fd55557a/medi-95-e2477-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780d/4718277/efaa5e200418/medi-95-e2477-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780d/4718277/8bb8fd55557a/medi-95-e2477-g017.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterizing Decision-Analysis Performances of Risk Prediction Models Using ADAPT Curves.使用ADAPT曲线表征风险预测模型的决策分析性能
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(2):e2477. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002477.
2
Using the weighted area under the net benefit curve for decision curve analysis.在决策曲线分析中使用净效益曲线下的加权面积。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 18;16:94. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0336-x.
3
ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models.受试者工作特征曲线在临床预测模型中的应用(一):评估临床预测模型性能时,ROC 曲线在 AUC 之上并未显示出附加价值。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.028. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
4
Graphical assessment of incremental value of novel markers in prediction models: From statistical to decision analytical perspectives.预测模型中新型标志物增量价值的图形评估:从统计学到决策分析视角
Biom J. 2015 Jul;57(4):556-70. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201300260. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
5
Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.决策曲线分析:一种评估预测模型的新方法。
Med Decis Making. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):565-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361.
6
Decision curve analysis to evaluate the clinical benefit of prediction models.决策曲线分析评估预测模型的临床获益。
Spine J. 2021 Oct;21(10):1643-1648. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
7
Prediction of the Pathologic Gleason Score to Inform a Personalized Management Program for Prostate Cancer.预测前列腺癌的病理格里森评分,为前列腺癌的个体化管理方案提供信息。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jul;72(1):135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
8
Putting risk prediction in perspective: relative utility curves.正确看待风险预测:相对效用曲线。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Nov 18;101(22):1538-42. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp353. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
9
Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers.决策曲线分析的扩展,一种评估诊断试验、预测模型和分子标志物的新方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Nov 26;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-53.
10
Comparison of three different tools for prediction of seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy.比较三种不同工具在根治性前列腺切除术前预测精囊侵犯的效果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Oct;62(4):590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.022. Epub 2012 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Multimorbidity Analysis of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Northwest Italy: Longitudinal Study Using Evolutionary Machine Learning and Health Administrative Data.意大利西北部 COVID-19 住院患者的多种合并症分析:使用进化机器学习和健康行政数据的纵向研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 18;10:e52353. doi: 10.2196/52353.
2
Optimal Size Criterion for Malignant Lymph Nodes and a Novel Lymph Node Clinical Staging System for Unresectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Evaluation by Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography.恶性淋巴结的最佳大小标准及不可切除食管鳞状细胞癌的新型淋巴结临床分期系统:多层螺旋计算机断层扫描评估
J Cancer. 2021 Sep 3;12(21):6454-6464. doi: 10.7150/jca.61994. eCollection 2021.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Alternative performance measures for prediction models.预测模型的替代性能指标。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 7;9(3):e91249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091249. eCollection 2014.
2
Evaluation of markers and risk prediction models: overview of relationships between NRI and decision-analytic measures.评价指标和风险预测模型:净重新分类指数与决策分析指标间关系概述。
Med Decis Making. 2013 May;33(4):490-501. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12470757. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
3
Decision curve analysis revisited: overall net benefit, relationships to ROC curve analysis, and application to case-control studies.
Decision curve analysis: a technical note.
决策曲线分析:技术说明
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Aug;6(15):308. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.07.02.
4
A comprehensive validation of HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure models to assist decision-making in targeted therapeutics.全面验证乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭模型,以辅助靶向治疗决策。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 16;6:33389. doi: 10.1038/srep33389.
再探决策曲线分析:整体净获益、与 ROC 曲线分析的关系,以及在病例对照研究中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Jun 22;11:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-45.
4
Two criteria for evaluating risk prediction models.评估风险预测模型的两个标准。
Biometrics. 2011 Sep;67(3):1057-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01523.x. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
5
Assessing the Incremental Role of Novel and Emerging Risk Factors.评估新型和新兴风险因素的增量作用。
Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2010 Mar 1;4(2):112-119. doi: 10.1007/s12170-010-0084-x.
6
Assessing risk prediction models in case-control studies using semiparametric and nonparametric methods.应用半参数和非参数方法评估病例对照研究中的风险预测模型。
Stat Med. 2010 Jun 15;29(13):1391-410. doi: 10.1002/sim.3876.
7
Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction.使用相对效用曲线评估风险预测。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Oct 1;172(4):729-748. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00592.x.
8
Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.评估预测模型的性能:传统和新型指标的框架。
Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):128-38. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2.
9
Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers.决策曲线分析的扩展,一种评估诊断试验、预测模型和分子标志物的新方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Nov 26;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-53.
10
Genotype score in addition to common risk factors for prediction of type 2 diabetes.除常见风险因素外,基因型评分对2型糖尿病的预测作用
N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 20;359(21):2208-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804742.