Rao Prashanth J, Phan Kevin, Maharaj Monish M, Pelletier Matthew H, Walsh William R, Mobbs Ralph J
NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, NSW, Australia; NeuroSpine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Suite 7, Level 7, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia; University of New South Wales (UNSW) Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, NSW, Australia; NeuroSpine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Suite 7, Level 7, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia; University of New South Wales (UNSW) Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Apr;26:14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.05.064. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
With the potential of bias from subjective evaluation scores in spine surgery, there is a need for practical and accurate quantitative methods of analysing patient recovery. In recent years, technologies such as accelerometers and global positioning systems have been introduced as potential objective measures for pain and symptoms following spine surgery. Overall, this perspective article aims to discuss and critique currently utilised methods of monitoring spine surgical outcomes. After analysing current modalities it will briefly analyse new potential methods before examining the place for accelerometers in the field of spine surgery. A literature review was performed on the use of accelerometers for objective evaluation of symptoms and disability after spine surgery, and perspectives are summarised in this article. Physical activity measurement with the use of accelerometers following spine surgery patients is practical and quantitative. The currently available accelerometers have the potential to transform the way functional outcomes from spine surgery are assessed. One key advantage is the collection of standardised objective measurements across studies. Future studies should aim to validate accelerometer data in relation to traditional measures of functional recovery, patient outcomes, and physical activity.
鉴于脊柱手术主观评估分数存在偏差的可能性,需要实用且准确的定量方法来分析患者的恢复情况。近年来,诸如加速度计和全球定位系统等技术已被引入,作为脊柱手术后疼痛和症状的潜在客观测量方法。总体而言,这篇观点文章旨在讨论和批评当前用于监测脊柱手术结果的方法。在分析当前模式之后,将简要分析新的潜在方法,然后探讨加速度计在脊柱手术领域的作用。对使用加速度计客观评估脊柱手术后症状和残疾情况进行了文献综述,本文总结了相关观点。对脊柱手术患者使用加速度计进行身体活动测量是实用且定量的。目前可用的加速度计有可能改变评估脊柱手术功能结果的方式。一个关键优势是在各项研究中收集标准化的客观测量数据。未来的研究应旨在验证加速度计数据与功能恢复、患者结果和身体活动的传统测量方法之间的关系。