Bourne George K, Barber Andrew J, Wilson Paul H R
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2015 Dec;23(4):213-8.
A 37 year old male presented with the complaint of a loose and bulky acrylic obturator prosthesis. He had previously tried to using a different acrylic obturator prostheses as well as both cobalt chromium and titanium framework obturators. The most successful previous prosthesis was a titanium based obturator which had performed well prior to a fractured clasp. Accordingly, following an exploration of the available surgical and prosthodontic treatment options, a further tooth borne partial maxillary obturator was provided successfully. The case highlights the relative merits and limitations of the use of cast titanium as a denture base material in partial denture and obturator construction.
一名37岁男性因丙烯酸封闭器假体松动且体积过大前来就诊。他此前曾尝试使用不同的丙烯酸封闭器假体以及钴铬和钛框架封闭器。之前最成功的假体是一个钛基封闭器,在卡环折断之前效果良好。因此,在探讨了可用的外科和修复治疗方案后,成功提供了另一个牙支持式部分上颌封闭器。该病例凸显了在局部义齿和封闭器制作中使用铸造钛作为义齿基托材料的相对优点和局限性。