da Costa Vieira René Aloisio, Lopes Ana Helena, Sarri Almir José, Benedetti Zuleica Caulada, de Oliveira Cleyton Zanardo
Posgraduate Oncology Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, Bairro Dr Paulo Prata, Barretos, SP, CEP: 14.784.400, Brazil.
UNIFAFIBE Universitary Center, Barretos, Brazil.
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Jun;32(2):344-351. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0979-9.
The e-learning education is a promising method, but there are few prospective randomized publications in oncology. The purpose of this study was to assess the level of retention of information in oncology from undergraduate students of physiotherapy. A prospective, controlled, randomized, crossover study, 72 undergraduate students of physiotherapy, from the second to fourth years, were randomized to perform a course of physiotherapy in oncology (PHO) using traditional classroom or e-learning. Students were offered the same content of the subject. The teacher in the traditional classroom model and the e-learning students used the Articulate® software. The course tackled the main issues related to PHO, and it was divided into six modules, 18 lessons, evaluated by 126 questions. A diagnosis evaluation was performed previous to the course and after every module. The sample consisted of 67 students, allocated in groups A (n = 35) and B (n = 32), and the distribution was homogeneous between the groups. Evaluating the correct answers, we observed a limited score in the pre-test (average grade 44.6 %), which has significant (p < 0.001) improvement in post-test evaluation (average grade 73.9 %). The correct pre-test (p = 0.556) and post-test (p = 0.729) evaluation and the retention of information (p = 0.408) were not different between the two groups. The course in PHO allowed significant acquisition of knowledge to undergraduate students, but the level of information retention was statistically similar between the traditional classroom form and the e-learning, a fact that encourages the use of e-learning in oncology.
REBECU1111-1142-1963.
电子学习教育是一种很有前景的方法,但肿瘤学领域前瞻性随机研究的出版物较少。本研究的目的是评估物理治疗专业本科生对肿瘤学信息的掌握程度。这是一项前瞻性、对照、随机、交叉研究,72名二至四年级的物理治疗专业本科生被随机分为两组,分别采用传统课堂教学或电子学习方式学习肿瘤物理治疗课程(PHO)。两组学生学习相同的课程内容。传统课堂模式的教师和电子学习的学生都使用Articulate®软件。该课程涵盖了与PHO相关的主要问题,共分为六个模块、18节课,通过126道问题进行评估。在课程开始前和每个模块结束后进行诊断评估。样本包括67名学生,分为A组(n = 35)和B组(n = 32),两组分布均匀。通过评估正确答案,我们发现预测试成绩有限(平均成绩44.6%),而在测试后评估中有显著提高(平均成绩73.9%,p < 0.001)。两组在预测试(p = 0.556)、后测试(p = 0.729)评估以及信息保留率(p = 0.408)方面没有差异。PHO课程使本科生显著获得了知识,但传统课堂教学形式和电子学习在信息保留水平上在统计学上相似,这一事实鼓励在肿瘤学中使用电子学习。
REBECU1111 - 1142 - 1963。