Suppr超能文献

评估基于手术量的肝脏手术转诊相关成本。

Assessing the Costs Associated with Volume-Based Referral for Hepatic Surgery.

作者信息

Gani Faiz, Pawlik Timothy M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street Blalock 688, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 May;20(5):945-52. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-3071-1. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although proposed as a means for quality improvement, little is known regarding the economic consequences of volume-based referral. The objective of the current study was to investigate the relationship between inpatient costs and hospital volume.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective liver surgery were identified using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2001 to 2012. Multivariable hierarchical regression analyses were performed to calculate and compare risk-adjusted costs and postoperative outcomes across hospital volume terciles.

RESULTS

A total of 27,813 patients underwent surgery at 2207 hospitals. Although costs were comparable across the three volume groups (all p > 0.05), patients who developed a postoperative complication incurred a higher overall cost (complication vs. no complication; median costs $17,974 [IQR 13,865-25,623] vs. $41,731 [IQR 27,008-64,266], p < 0.001). In contrast, while the incidence of postoperative complications (low vs. intermediate vs. high; 22.0 vs. 19.2 vs. 13.0 %, p < 0.001) and subsequent failure-to-rescue (low vs. intermediate vs. high; 16.6 vs. 24.7 vs. 15.1 %, p < 0.001) was lower at high-volume hospitals, costs associated with "rescue" were substantially higher at high-volume hospitals (low vs. intermediate vs. high; $39,289 vs. $36,157 vs. $48,559, both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with lower volume hospitals, improved outcomes among patients who developed a complication at high-volume hospitals were associated with an increased cost.

摘要

背景

尽管基于数量的转诊被提议作为提高质量的一种手段,但对于其经济后果却知之甚少。本研究的目的是调查住院费用与医院数量之间的关系。

方法

利用2001年至2012年的全国住院患者样本确定接受择期肝脏手术的患者。进行多变量分层回归分析,以计算和比较不同医院数量三分位数的风险调整成本和术后结果。

结果

共有27813例患者在2207家医院接受手术。尽管三个数量组的成本相当(所有p>0.05),但发生术后并发症的患者总体成本更高(有并发症与无并发症;中位成本分别为17974美元[四分位间距13865 - 25623美元]与41731美元[四分位间距27008 - 64266美元],p<0.001)。相比之下,虽然高容量医院的术后并发症发生率(低与中与高;22.0%对19.2%对13.0%,p<0.001)和随后的抢救失败率(低与中与高;16.6%对24.7%对15.1%,p<0.001)较低,但高容量医院与“抢救”相关的成本显著更高(低与中与高;39289美元对36157美元对48559美元,两者p<0.001)。

结论

与低容量医院相比,高容量医院发生并发症的患者预后改善,但成本增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验