Chabot D, Steffensen J F, Farrell A P
Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Mont-Joli, QC, G5H 3Z4, Canada.
Department of Biology, Marine Biological Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, Strandpromenaden 5, DK-3000, Helsingør, Denmark.
J Fish Biol. 2016 Jan;88(1):81-121. doi: 10.1111/jfb.12845.
This review and data analysis outline how fish biologists should most reliably estimate the minimal amount of oxygen needed by a fish to support its aerobic metabolic rate (termed standard metabolic rate; SMR). By reviewing key literature, it explains the theory, terminology and challenges underlying SMR measurements in fishes, which are almost always made using respirometry (which measures oxygen uptake, ṀO2 ). Then, the practical difficulties of measuring SMR when activity of the fish is not quantitatively evaluated are comprehensively explored using 85 examples of ṀO2 data from different fishes and one crustacean, an analysis that goes well beyond any previous attempt. The main objective was to compare eight methods to estimate SMR. The methods were: average of the lowest 10 values (low10) and average of the 10% lowest ṀO2 values, after removing the five lowest ones as outliers (low10%), mean of the lowest normal distribution (MLND) and quantiles that assign from 10 to 30% of the data below SMR (q0·1 , q0·15 , q0·2 , q0·25 and q0·3 ). The eight methods yielded significantly different SMR estimates, as expected. While the differences were small when the variability was low amongst the ṀO2 values, they were important (>20%) for several cases. The degree of agreement between the methods was related to the c.v. of the observations that were classified into the lowest normal distribution, the c.v. MLND (C.V.MLND ). When this indicator was low (≤5·4), it was advantageous to use the MLND, otherwise, one of the q0·2 or q0·25 should be used. The second objective was to assess if the data recorded during the initial recovery period in the respirometer should be included or excluded, and the recommendation is to exclude them. The final objective was to determine the minimal duration of experiments aiming to estimate SMR. The results show that 12 h is insufficient but 24 h is adequate. A list of basic recommendations for practitioners who use respirometry to measure SMR in fishes is provided.
本综述及数据分析概述了鱼类生物学家应如何最可靠地估计鱼类维持其有氧代谢率所需的最低氧量(称为标准代谢率;SMR)。通过回顾关键文献,解释了鱼类SMR测量背后的理论、术语和挑战,这些测量几乎总是使用呼吸测定法(测量氧气摄取量,ṀO2)进行。然后,利用来自不同鱼类和一种甲壳类动物的85个ṀO2数据实例,全面探讨了在未对鱼类活动进行定量评估时测量SMR的实际困难,这一分析远超以往任何尝试。主要目的是比较八种估计SMR的方法。这些方法分别是:最低10个值的平均值(low10)以及在去除五个最低值作为异常值后,10%最低ṀO2值的平均值(low10%)、最低正态分布的平均值(MLND)以及将10%至30%的数据分配到低于SMR的分位数(q0·1、q0·15、q0·2、q0·25和q0·3)。正如预期的那样,这八种方法得出的SMR估计值存在显著差异。当ṀO2值之间的变异性较低时,差异较小,但在几种情况下差异很大(>20%)。方法之间的一致程度与归类到最低正态分布的观测值的变异系数(c.v.),即MLND的变异系数(C.V.MLND)有关。当该指标较低(≤5·4)时,使用MLND是有利的,否则,应使用q0·2或q0·25中的一个。第二个目的是评估在呼吸测定仪中初始恢复期记录的数据应包含还是排除,建议排除这些数据。最后一个目的是确定旨在估计SMR的实验的最短持续时间。结果表明,12小时不足,但24小时足够。为使用呼吸测定法测量鱼类SMR的从业者提供了一份基本建议清单。