Halladay Jacqueline R, Mottus Kathleen, Reiter Kristin, Mitchell C Madeline, Donahue Katrina E, Gabbard Wilson M, Gush Kimberly
From the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):69-77. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150211.
The National Committee for Quality Assurance patient-centered medical home recognition program provides practices an opportunity to implement medical home activities. Understanding the costs to apply for recognition may enable practices to plan their work.
Practice coaches identified 5 exemplar practices (3 pediatric and 2 family medicine practices) that received level 3 recognition. This analysis focuses on 4 that received recognition in 2011. Clinical, informatics, and administrative staff participated in 2- to 3-hour interviews. We determined the time required to develop, implement, and maintain required activities. We categorized costs as (1) nonpersonnel, (2) developmental, (3) those used to implement activities, (4) those used to maintain activities, (5) those to document the work, and (6) consultant costs. Only incremental costs were included and are presented as costs per full-time equivalent (pFTE) provider.
Practice size ranged from 2.5 to 10.5 pFTE providers, and payer mixes ranged from 7% to 43% Medicaid. There was variation in the distribution of costs by activity by practice, but the costs to apply were remarkably similar ($11,453-15,977 pFTE provider).
The costs to apply for 2011 recognition were noteworthy. Work to enhance care coordination and close loops were highly valued. Financial incentives were key motivators. Future efforts to minimize the burden of low-value activities could benefit practices.
国家质量保证委员会以患者为中心的医疗之家认可计划为医疗机构提供了实施医疗之家活动的机会。了解申请认可的成本有助于医疗机构规划其工作。
实践指导人员确定了5个获得3级认可的典范医疗机构(3个儿科和2个家庭医学医疗机构)。本分析聚焦于2011年获得认可的4个机构。临床、信息学和行政人员参与了2至3小时的访谈。我们确定了开展、实施和维持所需活动所需的时间。我们将成本分为(1)非人员成本、(2)开发成本、(3)用于实施活动的成本、(4)用于维持活动的成本、(5)记录工作的成本以及(6)咨询成本。仅纳入增量成本,并以每个全时当量(pFTE)提供者的成本形式呈现。
医疗机构规模从2.5至10.5个pFTE提供者不等,支付方组合中医疗补助占比从7%至43%不等。各医疗机构按活动划分的成本分布存在差异,但申请成本非常相似(每个pFTE提供者为11,453 - 15,977美元)。
申请2011年认可的成本值得关注。加强护理协调和闭环工作受到高度重视。财务激励是关键推动因素。未来尽量减少低价值活动负担的努力可能会使医疗机构受益。