Martsolf Grant R, Kandrack Ryan, Friedberg Mark W, Briscombe Brian, Hussey Peter S, LaBonte Christiane
RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2019 Apr 30;6:2333392819842484. doi: 10.1177/2333392819842484. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
The performance of the any health-care system relies on a high-functioning primary care system. Increasing primary care practices' adoption of "comprehensive primary care" capabilities might yield meaningful improvements in the quality and efficiency of primary care. However, many comprehensive primary care capabilities, such as care management and coordination, are not compensated via traditional fee-for-service payment. To calculate new payments for these capabilities, policymakers would need estimates of the costs that practices incur when adopting, maintaining, and using the capabilities. We performed a narrative review of the existing literature on the costs of adopting and implementing comprehensive primary care capabilities. These studies have found that practices incur significant costs when adopting and implementing comprehensive primary care capabilities. However, the studies had significant limitations that prevent extensive use of their estimates for payment policy. Particularly, the strongest studies focused on a small numbers of practices in specific geographic areas and the concepts and methods used to assess costs varied greatly across the studies. Furthermore, none of the studies in our review attempted to estimate differences in costs across practices with patients at varying levels of complexity and illness burden which is important for risk-adjusting payments to practices. Therefore, due to the heterogeneous designs and limited generalizability of published studies highlight the need for additional research, especially if payers wish to link their financial support for comprehensive primary care capabilities to the costs of these capabilities for primary care practices.
任何医疗保健系统的运行都依赖于一个高效运作的初级保健系统。提高初级保健机构对“全面初级保健”能力的采用率,可能会在初级保健的质量和效率方面带来有意义的提升。然而,许多全面初级保健能力,如护理管理与协调,并非通过传统的按服务收费支付方式得到补偿。为了计算这些能力的新支付金额,政策制定者需要估计机构在采用、维持和使用这些能力时所产生的成本。我们对现有关于采用和实施全面初级保健能力成本的文献进行了叙述性综述。这些研究发现,机构在采用和实施全面初级保健能力时会产生重大成本。然而,这些研究存在重大局限性,阻碍了其估计结果在支付政策中的广泛应用。特别是,最有力的研究集中在特定地理区域的少数机构,而且各研究中用于评估成本的概念和方法差异很大。此外,我们综述中的研究均未尝试估计不同复杂度和疾病负担水平患者的机构之间的成本差异,而这对于根据风险调整向机构支付费用很重要。因此,由于已发表研究的设计异质性和有限的可推广性,凸显了进行更多研究的必要性,特别是如果支付方希望将其对全面初级保健能力的财政支持与这些能力对初级保健机构的成本联系起来的话。