Loskutova Natalia Y, Tsai Adam G, Fisher Edwin B, LaCruz Debby M, Cherrington Andrea L, Harrington T Michael, Turner Tamela J, Pace Wilson D
From the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, KS (NYL, WDP); the Division of General Internal Medicine (AGT) and the Department of Family Medicine (WDP), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; Peers for Progress and Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (EBF); YMCA of Greater Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (DML); and the Department of Medicine (ALC) and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (TMH, TJT), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):78-89. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150048.
Despite the recognized importance of lifestyle modification in reducing risk of developing type 2 diabetes and in diabetes management, the use of available community resources by both patients and their primary care providers (PCPs) remains low. The patient navigator model, widely used in cancer care, may have the potential to link PCPs and community resources for reduction of risk and control of type 2 diabetes. In this study we tested the feasibility and acceptability of telephone-based nonprofessional patient navigation to promote linkages between the PCP office and community programs for patients with or at risk for diabetes.
This was a mixed-methods interventional prospective cohort study conducted between November 2012 and August 2013. We included adult patients with and at risk for type 2 diabetes from six primary care practices. Patient-level measures of glycemic control, diabetes care, and self-efficacy from medical records, and qualitative interview data on acceptability and feasibility, were used.
A total of 179 patients participated in the study. Two patient navigators provided services over the phone, using motivational interviewing techniques. Patient navigators provided regular feedback to PCPs and followed up with the patients through phone calls. The patient navigators made 1028 calls, with an average of 6 calls per patient. At follow-up, reduction in HbA1c (7.8 ± 1.9% vs 7.2 ± 1.3%; P = .001) and improvement in patient self-efficacy (3.1 ± 0.8 vs 3.6 ± 0.7; P < .001) were observed. Qualitative analysis revealed uniformly positive feedback from providers and patients.
The patient navigator model is a promising and acceptable strategy to link patient, PCP, and community resources for promoting lifestyle modification in people living with or at risk for type 2 diabetes.
尽管人们认识到生活方式改变在降低2型糖尿病发病风险及糖尿病管理中的重要性,但患者及其初级保健提供者(PCP)对现有社区资源的利用程度仍然很低。在癌症护理中广泛使用的患者导航员模式,可能有潜力将初级保健提供者与社区资源联系起来,以降低2型糖尿病的风险并进行控制。在本研究中,我们测试了基于电话的非专业患者导航在促进初级保健提供者办公室与糖尿病患者或糖尿病高危患者的社区项目之间建立联系的可行性和可接受性。
这是一项在2012年11月至2013年8月期间进行的混合方法干预性前瞻性队列研究。我们纳入了来自六个初级保健机构的成年2型糖尿病患者及糖尿病高危患者。使用了来自病历的血糖控制、糖尿病护理和自我效能的患者层面测量指标,以及关于可接受性和可行性的定性访谈数据。
共有179名患者参与了该研究。两名患者导航员通过电话提供服务,采用动机性访谈技巧。患者导航员定期向初级保健提供者提供反馈,并通过电话对患者进行随访。患者导航员共拨打了1028个电话,平均每位患者6个电话。在随访时,观察到糖化血红蛋白水平降低(7.8±1.9%对7.2±1.3%;P = 0.001),患者自我效能提高(3.1±0.8对3.6±0.