• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国一项基于医院的低风险前列腺癌初始观察及其预测因素的研究。

A hospital-based study of initial observation for low-risk prostate cancer and its predictors in the United States.

作者信息

Maurice Matthew J, Zhu Hui, Abouassaly Robert

机构信息

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.

Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center and Cleveland Clinic South Pointe Hospital, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Mar-Apr;9(3-4):E193-9. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2606. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.2606
PMID:26770290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4695296/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Initial observation (IO) is a strategy to minimize prostate cancer overtreatment. We sought to evaluate contemporary trends in IO utilization for low-risk prostate cancer in the United States and to identify factors associated with its uptake.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified men with low-risk prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2011. IO utilization was plotted over time. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the influence of diagnosis year and other factors on IO selection.

RESULTS

Of the 219 971 men with low-risk prostate cancer, 21 231 (9.7%) underwent IO. Beginning in 2008, IO use increased significantly with time (range: 7.5%-14.3%). Compared to 2004, patients diagnosed in 2011 had 2.5 times the odds of choosing IO (odds ratio [OR] 2.5, confidence interval [CI] 2.3-2.6, p < 0.01). Aside from diagnosis year, age, race, Charlson score, clinical T stage, and PSA level predicted IO use (p < 0.01). Other predictors of IO included hospital type, insurance provider, and household income. Specifically, comprehensive cancer centres, private insurance, and higher income predicted decreased IO usage (OR 0.5, CI 0.5-0.5, p < 0.01; OR 0.4, CI 0.4-0.4, p < 0.01; and OR 0.8, CI 0.8-0.9, p < 0.01, respectively). Less educated men were also less likely to undergo observation (OR 0.8, CI 0.8-0.9, p < 0.01). Treatment within the western United States was significantly, but weakly, associated with increased use of IO (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In recent years, low-risk prostate cancer has been increasingly managed with IO, appropriately driven by patient and disease factors. Unexpectedly, observation usage also varies by race, hospital, insurance, income, and geography, suggesting that non-clinical factors may affect treatment selection.

摘要

引言

初始观察(IO)是一种将前列腺癌过度治疗降至最低的策略。我们试图评估美国低风险前列腺癌IO利用的当代趋势,并确定与其采用相关的因素。

方法

利用国家癌症数据库,我们确定了2004年至2011年期间被诊断为低风险前列腺癌的男性。IO利用率随时间进行了绘制。进行多因素逻辑回归以确定诊断年份和其他因素对IO选择的影响。

结果

在219971名低风险前列腺癌男性中,21231名(9.7%)接受了IO。从2008年开始,IO的使用随时间显著增加(范围:7.5%-14.3%)。与2004年相比,2011年诊断的患者选择IO的几率是其2.5倍(优势比[OR]2.5,置信区间[CI]2.3-2.6,p<0.01)。除诊断年份外,年龄、种族、查尔森评分、临床T分期和PSA水平可预测IO的使用(p<0.01)。IO的其他预测因素包括医院类型、保险提供商和家庭收入。具体而言,综合癌症中心、私人保险和较高收入预测IO使用减少(OR 0.5,CI 0.5-0.5,p<0.01;OR 0.4,CI 0.4-0.4,p<0.01;OR 0.8,CI 0.8-0.9,p<0.01,分别)。受教育程度较低的男性接受观察的可能性也较小(OR 0.8,CI 0.8-0.9,p<0.01)。美国西部的治疗与IO使用增加显著但微弱相关(p<0.01)。

结论

近年来,低风险前列腺癌越来越多地通过IO进行管理,这是由患者和疾病因素适当驱动的。出乎意料的是,观察的使用也因种族、医院、保险、收入和地理位置而异,这表明非临床因素可能影响治疗选择。

相似文献

1
A hospital-based study of initial observation for low-risk prostate cancer and its predictors in the United States.美国一项基于医院的低风险前列腺癌初始观察及其预测因素的研究。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Mar-Apr;9(3-4):E193-9. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2606. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
2
Patient characterization and usage trends of proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer in the United States: A study of the National Cancer Database.美国局部前列腺癌质子束治疗的患者特征及使用趋势:一项基于国家癌症数据库的研究
Urol Oncol. 2017 Jun;35(6):438-446. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Prostate brachytherapy: a descriptive analysis from CaPSURE.前列腺近距离放射治疗:来自CaPSURE的描述性分析。
Brachytherapy. 2007 Apr-Jun;6(2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2007.01.007.
4
Cost implications and complications of overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer in the United States.美国低危前列腺癌过度治疗的成本影响和并发症。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Jan;13(1):61-8. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0009.
5
The association between insurance status and prostate cancer outcomes: implications for the Affordable Care Act.保险状况与前列腺癌治疗结果之间的关联:对《平价医疗法案》的影响。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014 Sep;17(3):273-9. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2014.23. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
6
Initial management of prostate-specific antigen-detected, low-risk prostate cancer and the risk of death from prostate cancer.前列腺特异性抗原检出的低危前列腺癌的初始管理和前列腺癌死亡风险。
BJU Int. 2014 Jan;113(1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11789.x. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
7
Association of insurance and race/ethnicity with disease severity among men diagnosed with prostate cancer, National Cancer Database 2004-2006.2004-2006 年国家癌症数据库中男性前列腺癌诊断患者的保险状况和种族/民族与疾病严重程度的关系。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Oct;19(10):2437-44. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0299. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
8
Time trends and characteristics of men choosing watchful waiting for initial treatment of localized prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.选择观察等待作为局限性前列腺癌初始治疗方法的男性患者的时间趋势及特征:来自CaPSURE的结果
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1804-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000091641.34674.11.
9
Active treatment in low-risk prostate cancer: a population-based study.低危前列腺癌的积极治疗:一项基于人群的研究。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Aug;26(4):e535-e540. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4953. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
10
Impact of Health Insurance Status on Prostate Cancer Treatment Modality Selection in the United States.健康保险状况对美国前列腺癌治疗方式选择的影响。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;41(11):1062-1068. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000423.

引用本文的文献

1
Selecting Active Surveillance: Decision Making Factors for Men with a Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.选择主动监测:低危前列腺癌患者的决策因素。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Nov;39(8):962-974. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19883242. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
2
Robotic prostatectomy is associated with increased patient travel and treatment delay.机器人前列腺切除术与患者行程增加和治疗延迟相关。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 May-Jun;10(5-6):192-201. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3628.

本文引用的文献

1
American trends in expectant management utilization for prostate cancer from 2000 to 2009.2000年至2009年美国前列腺癌期待治疗利用情况的趋势
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Nov;8(11-12):E775-82. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2073.
2
Increasing use of observation among men at low risk for prostate cancer mortality.在前列腺癌死亡风险较低的男性中,观察的使用越来越多。
J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.102. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
3
Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up.前列腺癌筛查与死亡率:欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)13年随访结果
Lancet. 2014 Dec 6;384(9959):2027-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
4
Expected population impacts of discontinued prostate-specific antigen screening.停止前列腺特异性抗原筛查的预期人口影响。
Cancer. 2014 Nov 15;120(22):3519-26. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28932. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
5
Variation in treatment associated with life expectancy in a population-based cohort of men with early-stage prostate cancer.基于人群的早期前列腺癌男性队列中,与预期寿命相关的治疗差异。
Cancer. 2014 Dec 1;120(23):3642-50. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28926. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
6
Decisional conflict in economically disadvantaged men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: baseline results from a shared decision-making trial.经济条件不利的新诊断前列腺癌男性的决策冲突:一项共同决策试验的基线结果
Cancer. 2014 Sep 1;120(17):2721-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28755. Epub 2014 May 9.
7
Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer in African American men: a multi-institutional experience.非裔美国男性低危前列腺癌的主动监测:多机构经验。
Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):364-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.038. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
8
Population based study of use and determinants of active surveillance and watchful waiting for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.基于人群的研究:低危和中危前列腺癌采用主动监测和观察等待的使用情况及其决定因素。
J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1742-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.054. Epub 2013 May 30.
9
Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌治疗后的长期功能结局。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):436-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209978.
10
The impact of socioeconomic status on prostate cancer treatment and survival in the southern Netherlands.荷兰南部社会经济地位对前列腺癌治疗和生存的影响。
Urology. 2013 Mar;81(3):593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.011. Epub 2013 Jan 9.