Suppr超能文献

2000年至2009年美国前列腺癌期待治疗利用情况的趋势

American trends in expectant management utilization for prostate cancer from 2000 to 2009.

作者信息

Maurice Matthew J, Abouassaly Robert, Zhu Hui

机构信息

Urological Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH;

Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center; and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Nov;8(11-12):E775-82. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2073.

Abstract

INTRODUCTON

The overtreatment of early prostate cancer has become a major public health concern. Expectant management (EM) is a strategy to minimize overtreatment, but little is known about its pattern of use. We sought to examine national EM utilization over the preceding decade.

METHODS

We examined prostate cancer treatment utilization from 2000 to 2009 using the National Cancer Database. EM use was analyzed in relation to other treatments and by cancer stage, age group, Charlson score, and hospital practice setting.

RESULTS

Overall, 109 997 (8.2%) men were managed initially with EM. EM usage remained stable at 7.6% to 9.5% from 2000 to 2009 with no appreciable increase for low-stage cancers. Usage was only slightly higher in elderly patients and in patients with multiple comorbidities. Veterans Affairs and low-volume hospitals had a much higher and increasing EM rate (range: 18.8%-29.8% and 15.1%-24.2%, respectively), compared to community hospitals, comprehensive cancer centres, and teaching hospitals, which showed no increased adoption. On further analysis, EM use remained high for low-stage cancers at Veterans Affairs and low-volume hospitals (24.0% and 19.1%, respectively), regardless of age or comorbidity, a pattern not shared by other practice settings.

CONCLUSIONS

EM utilization remained low and stable last decade, regardless of disease or patient characteristics. Conversely, Veterans Affairs and low-volume hospitals led the trend in national EM adoption, particularly in men with low-stage cancers and limited life expectancies. The limitations of this dataset preclude any determination of the appropriateness of EM utilization. Nonetheless, further study is needed to identify factors influencing EM adoption to ensure its proper use in the future.

摘要

引言

早期前列腺癌的过度治疗已成为一个主要的公共卫生问题。观察等待管理(EM)是一种尽量减少过度治疗的策略,但对其使用模式知之甚少。我们试图研究过去十年全国范围内EM的使用情况。

方法

我们使用国家癌症数据库研究了2000年至2009年前列腺癌治疗的使用情况。分析了EM的使用与其他治疗方法的关系,并按癌症分期、年龄组、查尔森评分和医院执业环境进行分析。

结果

总体而言,109997名(8.2%)男性最初接受了EM管理。2000年至2009年,EM的使用率保持在7.6%至9.5%之间,低分期癌症的使用率没有明显增加。老年患者和患有多种合并症的患者的使用率仅略高。与社区医院、综合癌症中心和教学医院相比,退伍军人事务部医院和小容量医院的EM使用率更高且呈上升趋势(分别为18.8% - 29.8%和15.1% - 24.2%),而这些医院并未显示出使用率的增加。进一步分析发现,无论年龄或合并症情况如何,退伍军人事务部医院和小容量医院低分期癌症的EM使用率仍然很高(分别为24.0%和19.1%),其他执业环境则没有这种模式。

结论

在过去十年中,无论疾病或患者特征如何,EM的使用率都保持在较低且稳定的水平。相反,退伍军人事务部医院和小容量医院引领了全国采用EM的趋势,特别是在患有低分期癌症且预期寿命有限的男性中。该数据集的局限性排除了对EM使用适当性的任何确定。尽管如此,仍需要进一步研究以确定影响采用EM的因素,以确保其在未来的合理使用。

相似文献

1
American trends in expectant management utilization for prostate cancer from 2000 to 2009.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Nov;8(11-12):E775-82. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2073.
5
Expectant management of veterans with early-stage prostate cancer.
Cancer. 2016 Feb 15;122(4):626-33. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29785. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
6
PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies.
JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2336-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.19.2336.
8
A hospital-based study of initial observation for low-risk prostate cancer and its predictors in the United States.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Mar-Apr;9(3-4):E193-9. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2606. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
9
Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):465-73. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00006.
10
Changing Trends in Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer: The End of Overtreatment?
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):175-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A hospital-based study of initial observation for low-risk prostate cancer and its predictors in the United States.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Mar-Apr;9(3-4):E193-9. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2606. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Expected population impacts of discontinued prostate-specific antigen screening.
Cancer. 2014 Nov 15;120(22):3519-26. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28932. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
2
Use of advanced treatment technologies among men at low risk of dying from prostate cancer.
JAMA. 2013 Jun 26;309(24):2587-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6882.
4
A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.
Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):786-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
5
Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):436-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209978.
6
The impact of socioeconomic status on prostate cancer treatment and survival in the southern Netherlands.
Urology. 2013 Mar;81(3):593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.011. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
7
Overdiagnosis of prostate cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 Dec;2012(45):146-51. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs031.
8
Centralization of radical prostatectomy in the United States.
J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):500-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
9
Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162.
10
Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验