Qu Miao, Gao Xiaoyan, Hou Yikang, Shen Congcong, Xu Yourong, Zhu Ming, Wang Hengjian, Xu Haisong, Chai Gang, Zhang Yan
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Tissue Engineering Key Laboratory, Shanghai Research Institute of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Rapid Prototyping Center of Shanghai University China.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):17471-9. eCollection 2015.
To establish a two-dimensional biological printing technique of chondrocytes and compare the difference of related biological characters between printed chondrocytes and unprinted cells so as to control the cell transfer process and keep cell viability after printing.
Primary chondrocytes were obtained from human mature and fetal cartilage tissues and then were regularly sub-cultured to harvest cells at passage 2 (P2), which were adjusted to the single cell suspension at a density of 1×10(6)/mL. The experiment was divided into 2 groups: experimental group P2 chondrocytes were transferred by rapid prototype biological printer (driving voltage value 50 V, interval in x-axis 300 μm, interval in y-axis 1500 μm). Afterwards Live/Dead viability Kit and flow cytometry were respectively adopted to detect cell viability; CCK-8 Kit was adopted to detect cell proliferation viability; immunocytochemistry, immunofluorescence and RT-PCR was employed to identify related markers of chondrocytes; control group steps were the same as the printing group except that cell suspension received no printing.
Fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry analyses showed that there was no significant difference between experimental group and control group in terms of cell viability. After 7-day in vitro culture, control group exhibited higher O.D values than experimental group from 2nd day to 7th day but there was no distinct difference between these two groups (P>0.05). Inverted microscope observation demonstrated that the morphology of these two groups had no significant difference either. Similarly, Immunocytochemistry, immunofluorescence and RT-PCR assays also showed that there was no significant difference in the protein and gene expression of type II collagen and aggrecan between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Cell printing has no distinctly negative effect on cell vitality, proliferation and phenotype of chondrocytes. Biological printing technique may provide a novel approach for realizing the oriented, quantificational and regular distribution of chondrocytes in a two-dimensional plane and lay the foundation for the construction of three-dimensional cell printing or even organ printing system.
建立软骨细胞的二维生物打印技术,比较打印软骨细胞与未打印细胞相关生物学特性的差异,以控制细胞转移过程并保持打印后细胞活力。
从人成熟及胎儿软骨组织获取原代软骨细胞,常规传代培养至第2代(P2)收获细胞,调整为密度为1×10(6)/mL的单细胞悬液。实验分为2组:实验组将P2软骨细胞通过快速原型生物打印机进行转移(驱动电压值50 V,x轴间距300 μm,y轴间距1500 μm)。之后分别采用活/死细胞活力试剂盒和流式细胞术检测细胞活力;采用CCK-8试剂盒检测细胞增殖活力;采用免疫细胞化学、免疫荧光和RT-PCR鉴定软骨细胞相关标志物;对照组步骤与打印组相同,只是细胞悬液未进行打印。
荧光显微镜和流式细胞术分析显示,实验组与对照组在细胞活力方面无显著差异。体外培养7天后,从第2天至第7天,对照组的光密度值高于实验组,但两组之间无明显差异(P>0.05)。倒置显微镜观察表明,两组的形态也无显著差异。同样,免疫细胞化学、免疫荧光和RT-PCR检测也显示,两组之间Ⅱ型胶原蛋白和聚集蛋白聚糖的蛋白质和基因表达无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论细胞打印对软骨细胞的活力、增殖和表型无明显负面影响。生物打印技术可为实现软骨细胞在二维平面上的定向、定量和规则分布提供一种新方法,并为构建三维细胞打印甚至器官打印系统奠定基础。