Persson R, Svendsen J, Daubert K
Department of Periodontology, University of Washington, Seattle.
J Clin Periodontol. 1989 Oct;16(9):569-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1989.tb02139.x.
A retrospective 3-year longitudinal evaluation of periodontal therapy using the CPITN index was performed. Each sextant in 123 patients exhibiting moderate to advanced adult periodontitis was given a score that recorded the condition of the worst affected site in that sextant. Whereas very few sextants had an initial CPITN Code 0, the prevalence of sextants with an initial CPITN Code 4 was quite high. Posterior sextants with CPITN Code 4 were more likely treated with surgery than sextants with CPITN Code 3. Although surgery appeared to be more effective than non-surgical therapy in reducing the CPITN Codes for posterior sextants at 1 year, there were no differences between the 2 forms of therapy at the 3-year examination. Anterior sextants were treated with a non-surgical approach regardless of CPITN Code at either initial examination or reevaluation. The outcome of therapy in this study using the CPITN index is comparable to other studies utilizing mean pocket depth and attachment level. Although the CPITN index does not prescribe specific therapeutic interventions, this index provides a useful tool to monitor patients in the treatment of periodontitis.
采用社区牙周治疗需要指数(CPITN)对牙周治疗进行了一项为期3年的回顾性纵向评估。对123例中度至重度成人牙周炎患者的每个牙 sextant 进行评分,记录该牙 sextant 中受影响最严重部位的情况。虽然最初CPITN代码为0的牙 sextant 很少,但最初CPITN代码为4的牙 sextant 的患病率相当高。CPITN代码为4的后牙 sextant 比CPITN代码为3的牙 sextant 更有可能接受手术治疗。虽然在1年时手术在降低后牙 sextant 的CPITN代码方面似乎比非手术治疗更有效,但在3年检查时两种治疗形式之间没有差异。无论在初次检查还是重新评估时CPITN代码如何,前牙 sextant 均采用非手术方法治疗。本研究中使用CPITN指数的治疗结果与其他使用平均牙周袋深度和附着水平的研究相当。虽然CPITN指数没有规定具体的治疗干预措施,但该指数为监测牙周炎患者的治疗提供了一个有用的工具。