Rams T E, Listgarten M A, Slots J
Division of Dental Medicine & Surgery, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Apr;23(4):355-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00557.x.
The relationship between CPITN sextant scores and periodontitis recurrence at individual tooth sites was evaluated in a longitudinal study in 83 treated adult periodontitis patients receiving systematic 3-month maintenance care. At baseline and semi-annual examinations over 36 months, CPITN scores were assigned to each dentition sextant using probing depths and gingival index scores, and relative periodontal attachment level was assessed at individual tooth sites using an occlusal reference stent. Periodontitis recurrence was defined as any periodontal site exhibiting either a probing depth increase of > or = 3 mm from baseline, or a probing depth increase of > or = 1 mm from baseline together with a loss of relative periodontal attachment of > or = 2 mm from baseline. 49 (59.0%) subjects developed periodontitis recurrence in 147 (29.8%) sextants at 181 (2.2%) individual periodontal sites during the 36-month study period. Baseline CPITN scores of 4 were more common in disease-active subjects than clinically-stable subjects (p = 0.003, t-test), and were associated with a statistically significant 1.66 relative risk of periodontitis recurrence within 36 months. CPITN sextant scores of 3 or 4 showed low specificity and low positive predictive values as indicators of periodontitis recurrence at > or = 1 individual sites within the affected sextant. In comparison, low CPITN sextant scores (0-2) provided high specificity (96.2-100%), high positive predictive values (99.5-100%), and a summary odds ratio of 24.2 as an indicator of clinical stability at all periodontal sites within a given dentition sextant. Changes in sextant scores for CPITN over 6-month periods showed no relationship with periodontitis recurrence at individual periodontal sites. This study suggests that while CPITN is inadequate for detection of periodontitis recurrence, low CPITN scores provide rapid presumptive identification of clinically-stable sextants in adult periodontitis patients on maintenance care.
在一项纵向研究中,对83名接受系统性3个月维护治疗的成年牙周炎患者进行评估,以确定社区牙周指数(CPITN)象限评分与个体牙位牙周炎复发之间的关系。在36个月的基线检查和半年一次的检查中,使用探诊深度和牙龈指数评分对每个牙列象限进行CPITN评分,并使用咬合参考支架在个体牙位评估相对牙周附着水平。牙周炎复发定义为任何牙周部位的探诊深度较基线增加≥3mm,或探诊深度较基线增加≥1mm且相对牙周附着丧失≥2mm。在36个月的研究期间,49名(59.0%)受试者在181个(2.2%)个体牙周部位的147个(29.8%)象限中出现了牙周炎复发。疾病活动期受试者的基线CPITN评分为4的情况比临床稳定期受试者更为常见(p = 0.003,t检验),并且与36个月内牙周炎复发的相对风险1.66具有统计学意义相关。CPITN象限评分为3或4作为受影响象限内≥1个个体部位牙周炎复发的指标,显示出低特异性和低阳性预测值。相比之下,低CPITN象限评分(0 - 2)具有高特异性(96.2 - 100%)、高阳性预测值(99.5 - 100%),并且作为给定牙列象限内所有牙周部位临床稳定性的指标,汇总比值比为24.2。CPITN象限评分在6个月期间的变化与个体牙周部位的牙周炎复发无关。这项研究表明,虽然CPITN不足以检测牙周炎复发,但低CPITN评分可为接受维护治疗的成年牙周炎患者快速初步识别临床稳定的象限。