• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知结构的验证:一种结构方程建模方法。

Validation of Cognitive Structures: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

作者信息

Dimitrov Dimiter M, Raykov Tenko

出版信息

Multivariate Behav Res. 2003 Jan 1;38(1):1-23. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_1.

DOI:10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_1
PMID:26771122
Abstract

Determining sources of item difficulty and using them for selection or development of test items is a bridging task of psychometrics and cognitive psychology. A key problem in this task is the validation of hypothesized cognitive operations required for correct solution of test items. In previous research, the problem has been addressed frequently via use of the linear logistic test model for prediction of item difficulties. The validation procedure discussed in this article is alternatively based on structural equation modeling of cognitive subordination relationships between test items. The method is illustrated using scores of ninth graders on an algebra test where the structural equation model fit supports the cognitive model. Results obtained with the linear logistic test model for the algebra test are also used for comparative purposes.

摘要

确定题目难度来源并将其用于题目选择或开发是心理测量学和认知心理学的一项衔接任务。这项任务中的一个关键问题是对正确解答测试题目所需的假设认知操作进行验证。在以往研究中,该问题常通过使用线性逻辑测试模型来预测题目难度加以解决。本文所讨论的验证程序则基于测试题目之间认知从属关系的结构方程模型。通过九年级学生代数测试成绩对该方法进行了说明,其中结构方程模型拟合支持了认知模型。代数测试的线性逻辑测试模型所得结果也用于比较目的。

相似文献

1
Validation of Cognitive Structures: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.认知结构的验证:一种结构方程建模方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2003 Jan 1;38(1):1-23. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_1.
2
[Validation of the cognitive structure of the test of signs by structural equation modeling].[通过结构方程模型验证体征测试的认知结构]
Psicothema. 2006 Nov;18(4):835-40.
3
Assessment of differential item functioning.差异项目功能评估。
J Appl Meas. 2008;9(4):387-408.
4
The roles of prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex in algebra problem solving: a case of using cognitive modeling to inform neuroimaging data.前额叶和顶叶后部皮质在代数问题解决中的作用:一个利用认知建模为神经影像数据提供信息的案例。
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 15;35(3):1365-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.032. Epub 2007 Feb 13.
5
Testing the difficulty theory of the SON-R 5(1/2)-17, a non-verbal test of intelligence.对SON-R 5(1/2)-17智力非言语测试的难度理论进行测试。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 May;67(2):248-65. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12017. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
6
Developing a fluid intelligence scale through a combination of Rasch modeling and cognitive psychology.通过整合拉什模型和认知心理学开发流体智力量表。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):774-88. doi: 10.1037/a0036712. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
7
Measuring disability in Medicare home care patients: application of Rasch modeling to the outcome and assessment information set.衡量医疗保险家庭护理患者的残疾情况:拉施模型在结局与评估信息集中的应用
Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):601-15. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062553.63745.7A.
8
Investigating the factorial invariance of the 28-item DBQ across genders and age groups: an Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling study.探讨 28 项 DBQ 在性别和年龄组间的因子不变性:一项探索性结构方程建模研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Sep;48:379-96. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
9
Identifying the most efficient items from the Mini-Mental State Examination for cognitive function assessment in older Taiwanese patients.从简易精神状态检查表中识别出对台湾老年患者认知功能评估最有效的项目。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Mar;16(3):502-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01551.x.
10
Test-retest stability of the Task and Ego Orientation Questionnaire.任务与自我取向问卷的重测稳定性
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005 Sep;76(3):339-46. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599304.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental vulnerability scale in primary health care: evidence of content and structure internal validity.初级卫生保健中的牙科脆弱性量表:内容和结构内部有效性的证据。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Aug 28;21(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01742-6.
2
Empirical evidence on factors influencing farmers' administrative burden: A structural equation modeling approach.关于影响农民行政负担因素的实证证据:结构方程建模方法。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241075. eCollection 2020.
3
Gleaning Information for Cognitive Operations from Don't Know Responses in Cognitive and Noncognitive Assessments.
从认知和非认知评估中的“不知道”回答中获取认知操作的信息。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;54(2):159-172. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1503075. Epub 2018 Oct 31.