Kleinstreuer Nicole C, Sullivan Kristie, Allen David, Edwards Stephen, Mendrick Donna L, Embry Michelle, Matheson Joanna, Rowlands J Craig, Munn Sharon, Maull Elizabeth, Casey Warren
National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;76:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
An adverse outcome pathway (AOP) helps to organize existing knowledge on chemical mode of action, starting with a molecular initiating event such as receptor binding, continuing through key events, and ending with an adverse outcome such as reproductive impairment. AOPs can help identify knowledge gaps where more research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms, aid in chemical hazard characterization, and guide the development of new testing approaches that use fewer or no animals. A September 2014 workshop in Bethesda, Maryland considered how the AOP concept could improve regulatory assessments of chemical toxicity. Scientists from 21 countries, representing industry, academia, regulatory agencies, and special interest groups, attended the workshop, titled Adverse Outcome Pathways: From Research to Regulation. Workshop plenary presentations were followed by breakout sessions that considered regulatory acceptance of AOPs and AOP-based tools, criteria for building confidence in an AOP for regulatory use, and requirements to build quantitative AOPs and AOP networks. Discussions during the closing session emphasized a need to increase transparent and inclusive collaboration, especially with disciplines outside of toxicology. Additionally, to increase impact, working groups should be established to systematically prioritize and develop AOPs. Multiple collaborative projects and follow-up activities resulted from the workshop.
不良结局途径(AOP)有助于梳理有关化学物质作用模式的现有知识,始于诸如受体结合等分子引发事件,经过关键事件,最终以诸如生殖损伤等不良结局告终。AOP有助于识别知识空白,即需要开展更多研究以了解潜在机制之处,有助于化学物质危害特征描述,并指导开发使用较少动物或不使用动物的新测试方法。2014年9月在马里兰州贝塞斯达举办的一次研讨会探讨了AOP概念如何改进化学物质毒性的监管评估。来自21个国家的科学家,代表行业、学术界、监管机构和特殊利益集团,参加了题为“不良结局途径:从研究到监管”的研讨会。全会报告之后是分组会议,讨论了监管机构对AOP及基于AOP的工具的接受情况、建立用于监管用途的AOP的置信度标准,以及构建定量AOP和AOP网络的要求。闭幕会议期间的讨论强调需要加强透明和包容性协作,尤其是与毒理学以外的学科协作。此外,为提高影响力,应设立工作组以系统地确定AOP的优先次序并开展相关开发工作。研讨会促成了多个合作项目和后续活动。