Edwards Stephen W, Tan Yu-Mei, Villeneuve Daniel L, Meek M E, McQueen Charlene A
Integrated Systems Toxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (S.W.E., C.A.M.), and Human Exposure & Atmospheric Sciences Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory (Y.-M.T.), Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; Mid-Continent Ecology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota (D.L.V.); and McLaughlin Centre for Risk Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.E.M.)
Integrated Systems Toxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (S.W.E., C.A.M.), and Human Exposure & Atmospheric Sciences Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory (Y.-M.T.), Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; Mid-Continent Ecology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota (D.L.V.); and McLaughlin Centre for Risk Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.E.M.).
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016 Jan;356(1):170-81. doi: 10.1124/jpet.115.228239. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
The number of chemicals for which environmental regulatory decisions are required far exceeds the current capacity for toxicity testing. High-throughput screening commonly used for drug discovery has the potential to increase this capacity. The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept has emerged as a framework for connecting high-throughput toxicity testing (HTT) and other results to potential impacts on human and wildlife populations. As a result of international efforts, the AOP development process is now well-defined and efforts are underway to broaden the participation through outreach and training. One key principle is that AOPs represent the chemical-agnostic portions of pathways to increase the generalizability of their application from early key events to overt toxicity. The closely related mode of action framework extends the AOP as needed when evaluating the potential risk of a specific chemical. This in turn enables integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA), which incorporate results of assays at various levels of biologic organization such as in silico; HTT; chemical-specific aspects including absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME); and an AOP describing the biologic basis of toxicity. Thus, it is envisaged that provision of limited information regarding both the AOP for critical effects and the ADME for any chemical associated with any adverse outcome would allow for the development of IATA and permit more detailed AOP and ADME research, where higher precision is needed based on the decision context.
需要做出环境监管决策的化学物质数量远远超过了当前的毒性测试能力。常用于药物研发的高通量筛选有潜力提高这种能力。不良结局途径(AOP)概念已成为一个框架,用于将高通量毒性测试(HTT)及其他结果与对人类和野生动物种群的潜在影响联系起来。由于国际社会的努力,AOP的开发流程现已明确界定,并且正在通过推广和培训来扩大参与度。一个关键原则是,AOP代表了途径中与化学物质无关的部分,以提高其从早期关键事件到明显毒性的应用的通用性。在评估特定化学物质的潜在风险时,密切相关的作用模式框架会根据需要扩展AOP。这反过来又促成了测试和评估的综合方法(IATA),该方法纳入了生物组织不同层面的检测结果,如计算机模拟;高通量毒性测试;包括吸收、分布、代谢和排泄(ADME)在内的化学物质特异性方面;以及描述毒性生物学基础的AOP。因此,可以设想,提供关于关键效应的AOP和与任何不良结局相关的任何化学物质的ADME的有限信息,将有助于开发IATA,并允许在决策背景需要更高精度时开展更详细 的AOP和ADME研究。