Moreno Courtney C, Weiss Paul S, Jarrett Thomas L, Roberts David L, Mittal Pardeep K, Votaw John R
Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 May-Jun;45(3):189-92. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate whether test features would make an individual more or less likely to undergo colorectal cancer screening and how much an individual would be willing to pay out of pocket for a screening test. The methods include an administration of a survey to consecutive adult patients of a general medicine clinic. The survey consisted of Likert-scale questions assessing the patients' likelihood of choosing a screening test based on various test characteristics. Additional questions measured the patients' age, race, gender, and maximum out-of-pocket cost they would be willing to pay. Chi-square tests were used to assess the associations between the likelihood questions and the various demographic characteristics. In results, survey response rate was 88.8% (213 of 240). Respondents were 48.4% female (103 of 213), 51.6% male (110 of 213), 82.6% White (176 of 213), 11.3% African-American (24 of 213), and 6.1% other (13 of 213). Risk of internal injury and light exposure to radiation were the least desirable test features. Light sedation was the only test feature that most respondents (54.8%) indicated would make them likely or very likely to undergo a colorectal cancer screening test. The vast majority of respondents (86.8%) were willing to pay less than $200 out of pocket for a colorectal cancer screening test. There was no statistically significant difference in the responses of males and females, or in the responses of individuals of different races or different ages regarding test features, or the amount individuals were willing to pay for a screening test. To conclude, survey results suggest that patient education emphasizing the low complication rate of computed tomographic colonography (CTC), the minimal risks associated with the low-level radiation exposure resulting from CTC, and the benefits of a sedation-free test (eg, no risk of sedation-related complication and no need for a driver) may increase patient acceptance of CTC. Additionally, an out-of-pocket cost of <$200 would be preferable from the patient perspective.
本调查的目的是评估检测特征是否会使个体更有可能或更不可能接受结直肠癌筛查,以及个体愿意自掏腰包为筛查检测支付多少钱。方法包括对一家普通内科诊所的成年患者连续进行问卷调查。该调查由李克特量表问题组成,评估患者基于各种检测特征选择筛查检测的可能性。其他问题测量了患者的年龄、种族、性别以及他们愿意支付的最高自付费用。卡方检验用于评估可能性问题与各种人口统计学特征之间的关联。结果显示,调查回复率为88.8%(240人中213人回复)。回复者中女性占48.4%(213人中103人),男性占51.6%(213人中110人),白人占82.6%(213人中176人),非裔美国人占11.3%(213人中24人),其他占6.1%(213人中13人)。内部受伤风险和轻度辐射暴露是最不理想的检测特征。轻度镇静是大多数受访者(54.8%)表示会使他们有可能或非常有可能接受结直肠癌筛查检测的唯一检测特征。绝大多数受访者(86.8%)愿意为结直肠癌筛查检测自掏腰包支付不到200美元。在检测特征或个体愿意为筛查检测支付的金额方面,男性和女性的回复、不同种族或不同年龄个体的回复之间没有统计学上的显著差异。总之,调查结果表明,强调计算机断层结肠成像(CTC)并发症发生率低、与CTC产生的低水平辐射暴露相关的最小风险以及无镇静检测的益处(如无镇静相关并发症风险且无需司机)的患者教育可能会提高患者对CTC的接受度。此外,从患者角度来看,自付费用低于200美元会更可取。