Department of Tissue Regeneration, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, 7500, AE, The Netherlands.
Laboratory for Surface Technology and Tribology, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, 7500, AE, The Netherlands.
Adv Healthc Mater. 2016 Jan 21;5(2):232-43. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500067. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
Additive manufactured scaffolds are fabricated from three commonly used biomaterials, polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (L\DL) lactic acid (P(L\DL)LA), and poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (PEOT/PBT). Scaffolds are compared biologically and tribologically. Cell-seeded PEOT/PBT scaffolds cultured in osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation media show statistical significantly higher alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity/DNA and glycosaminoglycans (GAG)/DNA ratios, followed by PCL and P(L\DL)LA scaffolds, respectively. The tribological performance is assessed by determining the friction coefficients of the scaffolds at different loads and sliding velocities. With increasing load or decreasing sliding velocity, the friction coefficient value decreases. PEOT/PBT show to have the lowest friction coefficient value, followed by PCL and P(L\DL)LA. The influence of the scaffold architecture is further determined with PEOT/PBT. Reducing of the fiber spacing results in a lower friction coefficient value. The best and the worst performing scaffold architecture are chosen to investigate the effect of cell culture on the friction coefficient. Matrix deposition is low in the cell-seeded scaffolds and the effect is, therefore, undetermined. Taken together, our studies show that PEOT/PBT scaffolds support better skeletal differentiation of seeded stromal cells and lower friction coefficient compared to PCL and P(L/DL)A scaffolds.
增材制造的支架由三种常用生物材料制成,聚己内酯(PCL)、聚(L/D)乳酸(P(L/D)LA)和聚(氧化乙烯)/聚(丁二酸丁二醇酯)(PEOT/PBT)。支架在生物学和摩擦学方面进行了比较。在成骨和成软骨分化培养基中培养的接种细胞的 PEOT/PBT 支架显示出统计学上更高的碱性磷酸酶(ALP)活性/DNA 和糖胺聚糖(GAG)/DNA 比值,其次是 PCL 和 P(L/D)LA 支架。通过确定支架在不同载荷和滑动速度下的摩擦系数来评估摩擦学性能。随着载荷的增加或滑动速度的降低,摩擦系数值降低。PEOT/PBT 显示出最低的摩擦系数值,其次是 PCL 和 P(L/D)LA。进一步通过 PEOT/PBT 确定支架结构的影响。纤维间距的减小导致摩擦系数值降低。选择最佳和最差的支架结构来研究细胞培养对摩擦系数的影响。在接种细胞的支架中基质沉积较低,因此效果不确定。综上所述,我们的研究表明,与 PCL 和 P(L/DL)A 支架相比,PEOT/PBT 支架更能支持基质细胞的骨骼分化和降低摩擦系数。