Frederick David A, Saguy Abigail C, Gruys Kjerstin
Crean School of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, USA.
Department of Sociology, UCLA, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:271-279. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.031. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
We conducted three experiments to examine how cultural frames shape attitudes about health, focusing on obesity, which is considered a public health crisis and is imbued with symbolic meaning.
College students (Ns = 99, 114, and 293) read news articles that presented high body weight according to one or more of the following frames: 1) public health crisis; 2) personal responsibility; 3) health at every size (HAES); or 4) fat rights.
Compared to people who read the HAES and Fat Rights articles, those who read the Public Health Crisis and Personal Responsibility articles expressed more belief in the health risks of being fat (ds = 1.28 to 1.79), belief that fat people should pay more for insurance (ds = 0.53 to 0.71), anti-fat prejudice (ds = 0.61 to 0.69), willingness to discriminate against fat people (ds = 0.41 to 0.59), and less willingness to celebrate body-size diversity (ds = 0.77 to 1.07). They were less willing to say women at the lower end of the obese range could be healthy. Exposure to these articles increased support for price-raising policies to curb obesity but not support for redistributive or compensatory policies. In Experiment 3, in comparison to a control condition, exposure to HAES or Fat Rights frames significantly reduced beliefs in the risks of obesity and support for charging fat people more for insurance. However, only people exposed to the Fat Rights frame expressed fewer anti-fat attitudes and more willingness to celebrate body-size diversity.
Our findings suggest that simply disseminating information that people can be both fat and healthy will not suffice to reduce prejudice. Given that anti-fat stigma is a health risk and barrier to collective solidarity, fat rights viewpoints can buffer against the negative consequences of anti-fat stigma and promote a culture of health by fostering empathy and social justice.
我们进行了三项实验,以研究文化框架如何塑造对健康的态度,重点关注肥胖问题,肥胖被视为一场公共卫生危机且具有象征意义。
大学生(人数分别为99、114和293)阅读新闻文章,这些文章根据以下一种或多种框架描述高体重情况:1)公共卫生危机;2)个人责任;3)各种身材皆健康(HAES);或4)肥胖权利。
与阅读HAES和肥胖权利文章的人相比,阅读公共卫生危机和个人责任文章的人更坚信肥胖存在健康风险(效应量d = 1.28至1.79),认为肥胖者应支付更多保险费用(效应量d = 0.53至0.71),存在反肥胖偏见(效应量d = 0.61至0.69),愿意歧视肥胖者(效应量d = 0.41至0.59),且不太愿意接受体型多样性(效应量d = 0.77至1.07)。他们不太愿意认为处于肥胖范围下限的女性可能健康。接触这些文章增加了对抑制肥胖的提价政策而不是对再分配或补偿政策的支持。在实验3中,与对照条件相比,接触HAES或肥胖权利框架显著降低了对肥胖风险的信念以及对向肥胖者收取更多保险费的支持。然而,只有接触肥胖权利框架的人表现出较少的反肥胖态度和更愿意接受体型多样性。
我们的研究结果表明,仅仅传播人们既可以肥胖又可以健康的信息不足以减少偏见。鉴于反肥胖污名是一种健康风险和集体团结的障碍,肥胖权利观点可以缓冲反肥胖污名的负面影响,并通过培养同理心和社会正义来促进健康文化。