School of Public Health, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Soc Sci Med. 2018 May;204:117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
The increasing prevalence of anti-fat bias in American society comes at a great cost to the health and well-being of people who are overweight or obese. A better understanding of the correlates of anti-fat bias would inform development of interventions for reducing anti-fat bias. Based on three theoretical perspectives, this study tested the relation between attitudes and beliefs about weight and anti-fat bias (implicit and explicit): (1) The belief that one is like people who are fat (social identity theory). (2) The belief that one can control her/his weight (attribution theory). And (3) the beliefs that most people prefer thin people and that weight is important (socio-cultural theory).
Participants were 66,799 volunteers (47,265 women, mean age of 27.88 ± 11.9 years) who completed the Thin-Fat Implicit Association Test on the Project Implicit website (https://implicit.harvard.edu/) during 2016. Explicit anti-fat bias and weight-related attitudes and beliefs were assessed by self-report. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to examine links between weight-related attitudes and beliefs and anti-fat bias.
All tested weight-related attitudes and beliefs were significantly (p < .001) correlated with explicit and implicit anti-fat bias, but some of the correlations were very weak. An examination of the relative contribution of the tested weight-related attitudes and beliefs to a model explaining anti-fat bias suggested that the strongest correlates of explicit anti-fat bias were the beliefs that weight was important (β = 0.194, p < .001), that most people prefer thin people (β = 0.177, p < .001), and that the respondent was like people who are fat (β = -0.180, p < .001).
The social-identity and socio-cultural theories may provide a stronger explanation for anti-fat bias relative to attribution theory. Future research could use longitudinal designs with more reliable measures in order to verify these cross-sectional findings.
在美国社会,反肥胖偏见的流行程度不断上升,这给超重或肥胖人群的健康和福祉带来了巨大的代价。更好地了解反肥胖偏见的相关性将为减少反肥胖偏见的干预措施提供信息。基于三个理论视角,本研究测试了与体重相关的态度和信念与反肥胖偏见(内隐和外显)之间的关系:(1)相信自己像胖人一样(社会认同理论)。(2)相信自己可以控制体重(归因理论)。(3)大多数人更喜欢瘦人,体重很重要的信念(社会文化理论)。
参与者为 66799 名志愿者(47265 名女性,平均年龄 27.88±11.9 岁),他们于 2016 年在 Project Implicit 网站(https://implicit.harvard.edu/)上完成了 Thin-Fat 内隐联想测试。外显的反肥胖偏见和与体重相关的态度和信念通过自我报告进行评估。进行了相关和回归分析,以检验与体重相关的态度和信念与反肥胖偏见之间的联系。
所有测试的与体重相关的态度和信念与外显和内隐的反肥胖偏见均呈显著相关(p<0.001),但有些相关性非常弱。对测试的与体重相关的态度和信念对解释反肥胖偏见模型的相对贡献的检查表明,外显反肥胖偏见的最强相关因素是认为体重很重要的信念(β=0.194,p<0.001),大多数人更喜欢瘦人(β=0.177,p<0.001),以及受访者与胖人相似的信念(β=-0.180,p<0.001)。
社会认同理论和社会文化理论相对于归因理论可能为反肥胖偏见提供更强的解释。未来的研究可以使用纵向设计和更可靠的测量方法来验证这些横断面研究结果。