Algina J, Olejnik S
Multivariate Behav Res. 2000 Jan 1;35(1):119-37. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_5.
While several resources are available to help researchers determine the minimum sample size needed to achieve target power for a wide variety of hypothesis tests, such resources are generally not available for determining the sample size when accurate parameter estimation is of interest. Sample size tables and procedures used to determine sample size for hypothesis tests should not be used for estimation because providing evidence that a parameter is not equal to some specific value is a fundamentally different task than accurately estimating the parameter. In particular, the necessary sample size required for hypothesis testing declines as the difference between the parameter and the specified value increases, but this difference does not have the same relationship to the sample size needed for accurate estimation. As interest in reporting estimates of effect sizes increases, sample size guidelines are needed for accurate estimation of these parameters. The present article focuses on the squared multiple correlation coefficient and presents regression equations that permit determination of sample size for estimating this parameter for up to 20 predictor variables. A comparison of the sample sizes reported here with those needed to test the hypothesis of no relationship between the predictor and criterion variables demonstrates the need for researchers to consider the purpose of their research and what is to be reported when determining the sample size for the study.
虽然有多种资源可帮助研究人员确定在各种假设检验中达到目标功效所需的最小样本量,但当关注准确的参数估计时,通常没有此类资源可用于确定样本量。用于确定假设检验样本量的样本量表和程序不应被用于估计,因为证明一个参数不等于某个特定值与准确估计该参数是根本不同的任务。特别是,假设检验所需的必要样本量会随着参数与指定值之间的差异增大而减少,但这种差异与准确估计所需的样本量并无相同关系。随着对报告效应量估计的关注度增加,准确估计这些参数需要样本量指南。本文重点关注复相关系数平方,并给出了回归方程,这些方程可用于确定在有多达20个预测变量的情况下估计该参数所需的样本量。将此处报告的样本量与检验预测变量和标准变量之间无关系假设所需的样本量进行比较,表明研究人员在确定研究样本量时需要考虑研究目的以及要报告的内容。