• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[精神科医生对患者自身健康责任的看法。一项定性研究]

[Views of psychiatrists on patients' responsibility for their own health. A qualitative study].

作者信息

Verhoef M, van Dartel J N, van Vliet I M

出版信息

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2016;58(1):11-9.

PMID:26779751
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands patients are increasingly being required to take responsibility for their own their health. However, an important problem not yet resolved is whether psychiatric patients are able or well enough to shoulder this responsibility.

AIM

To explore the normative views of psychiatrists concerning their responsibility of their patients' health.

METHOD

We performed a qualitative research in which 15 psychiatrists were interviewed with the help of a list of topics. The verbatim accounts of the interviews were analysed and interpreted by two researchers.

RESULTS

Psychiatrists differed in their views on the responsibility of patients for their own health. Some psychiatrists defined patient responsibility as a personal quality or disposition and regarded patients as being in principle responsible; others considered patient responsibility to be a construct or result of the therapeutic relationship. These two groups had different views about the moments and the ways in which patient responsibility becomes problematical. In addition, they had opposing views on current developments in government policies.

CONCLUSION

Psychiatrists differ in their interpretation of patient responsibility. This means they differ not only in their views on government policy but also probably in the attitudes they adopt in their daily practice. These differing attitudes to patient responsibility need to be looked at critically because they have a bearing on the observance of ethical norms and on the need to respect patients' autonomy.

摘要

背景

在荷兰,患者越来越需要对自己的健康负责。然而,一个尚未解决的重要问题是,精神科患者是否有能力或是否足够健康来承担这一责任。

目的

探讨精神科医生对患者健康责任的规范性观点。

方法

我们进行了一项定性研究,借助一系列主题清单对15名精神科医生进行了访谈。两位研究人员对访谈的逐字记录进行了分析和解读。

结果

精神科医生对患者自身健康责任的看法存在差异。一些精神科医生将患者责任定义为一种个人品质或性情,并认为患者原则上应承担责任;另一些人则认为患者责任是治疗关系的一种构建或结果。这两组人对患者责任成为问题的时刻和方式有不同看法。此外,他们对政府政策的当前发展持相反观点。

结论

精神科医生对患者责任的解释存在差异。这意味着他们不仅在对政府政策的看法上存在差异,而且在日常实践中可能采取的态度也存在差异。需要审慎看待这些对患者责任的不同态度,因为它们关系到道德规范的遵守以及尊重患者自主权的必要性。

相似文献

1
[Views of psychiatrists on patients' responsibility for their own health. A qualitative study].[精神科医生对患者自身健康责任的看法。一项定性研究]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2016;58(1):11-9.
2
Patients' views on responsibility for the management of musculoskeletal disorders--a qualitative study.患者对肌肉骨骼疾病管理的责任看法——一项定性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Aug 17;10:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-103.
3
Competency in shaping one's life: autonomy of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a nurse-led, shared-care setting; a qualitative study.塑造生活的能力:在护士主导的共享照护环境中2型糖尿病患者的自主性;一项定性研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 May;43(4):417-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.06.003. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
4
Perspectives of patients with schizophrenia and psychiatrists regarding ethically important aspects of research participation.精神分裂症患者和精神科医生对研究参与中伦理重要方面的看法。
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Jan;157(1):67-74. doi: 10.1176/ajp.157.1.67.
5
Independence/dependence--a contradictory relationship? Life with a chronic illness.独立/依赖——一种矛盾的关系?与慢性病共存的生活。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Sep;20(3):261-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00403.x.
6
Patient autonomy in nurse-led shared care: a review of theoretical and empirical literature.护士主导的共享护理中的患者自主权:理论与实证文献综述
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Feb;57(4):357-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04105.x.
7
Perceived control and involvement in self care in patients with colorectal cancer.结直肠癌患者的自我护理感知控制与参与度
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Aug;18(16):2292-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02802.x.
8
Individual patient's preferences for hypertension management: a Q-methodological approach.个体患者对高血压管理的偏好:一种Q方法学途径
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):354-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.011.
9
The modern patient - threat or promise? Physicians' perspectives on patients' changing attributes.现代患者——威胁还是希望?医生对患者不断变化的特质的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.017. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
10
The complexity of patient participation: lessons learned from patients' illness narratives.患者参与的复杂性:从患者的疾病叙述中汲取的经验教训。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Aug 2.